2023
DOI: 10.1098/rsos.230355
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coupling of coastal activity with tidal cycles is stronger in tool-using capuchins ( Cebus capucinus imitator )

Zoë Goldsborough,
Margaret C. Crofoot,
Shauhin E. Alavi
et al.

Abstract: Terrestrial mammals exploiting coastal resources must cope with the challenge that resource availability and accessibility fluctuate with tidal cycles. Tool use can improve foraging efficiency and provide access to structurally protected resources that are otherwise unavailable (e.g. molluscs and fruits). To understand how variable accessibility of valuable resources shapes behavioural patterns, and whether tool use aids in the efficient exploitation of intertidal resources, we compared the relationship betwee… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 82 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…White‐faced capuchins living on Jicarón and Coiba island are unhabituated, and thus all data presented here originates from indirect means of data collection, primarily via the deployment of camera traps. The group size of the Jicarón tool‐using group appears to be between 20 and 25 individuals, with at least 5 adult males and 5 or 6 adult females (fluctuating throughout the data collection) (for details on group identification, see Goldsborough et al, 2023). Less is known about the tool‐using group on Coiba island, so we cannot make estimates of group size or composition.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…White‐faced capuchins living on Jicarón and Coiba island are unhabituated, and thus all data presented here originates from indirect means of data collection, primarily via the deployment of camera traps. The group size of the Jicarón tool‐using group appears to be between 20 and 25 individuals, with at least 5 adult males and 5 or 6 adult females (fluctuating throughout the data collection) (for details on group identification, see Goldsborough et al, 2023). Less is known about the tool‐using group on Coiba island, so we cannot make estimates of group size or composition.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If they foraged, even briefly, this was coded instead. We calculated the distance of each camera site on Jicarón to the coast by taking the distance from a camera's GPS point to the nearest coastal vegetation boundary (for more details see Goldsborough et al, 2023).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…White-faced capuchins living on Jicarón and Coiba island are unhabituated, and thus all data presented here originates from indirect means of data collection, primarily via the deployment of camera traps. The group size of the Jicarón tool-using group appears to be between 20-25 individuals, with at least 5 adult males and 5 or 6 adult females (fluctuating throughout the data collection) (Goldsborough et al, in press). Less is known about the tool-using group on Coiba island, so we cannot make estimates of group size or composition.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If they foraged, even briefly, this was coded instead. We calculated the distance of each camera site on Jicarón to the coast by taking the distance from a camera’s GPS point to the nearest coastal vegetation boundary (for more details see Goldsborough et al, in press).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are also sex biases in some of the Panamanian Cebus groups, with males using tools more than females (Barrett et al, 2018), which joins examples such as male bias in probing tools among some Sapajus groups (Fal otico et al, 2021) to aid discussions going beyond technology into the social and developmental realms of past primates. While the most recent reports of Cebus tool use appeared too late for inclusion in the review (e.g., Goldsborough, Crofoot, Alavi, et al, 2023;Goldsborough, Crofoot, & Barrett, 2024)…”
Section: Technological Primatesmentioning
confidence: 99%