2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2011.01.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coupling of dielectric and mechanical relaxations with glass transition and stickiness of milk solids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
21
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
2
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…4 B). The T g values of lactose at 0.11-0.44 a w agreed with previous studies at a w below 0.44 (Potes et al, 2012;Silalai & Roos, 2011). The T g in carbohydrates systems depends upon their composition (Gordon & Taylor, 1952).…”
Section: Glass Transition and Water Losssupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…4 B). The T g values of lactose at 0.11-0.44 a w agreed with previous studies at a w below 0.44 (Potes et al, 2012;Silalai & Roos, 2011). The T g in carbohydrates systems depends upon their composition (Gordon & Taylor, 1952).…”
Section: Glass Transition and Water Losssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Glass transition temperature (T g ) of pure lactose and lactose-WPI mixtures stored from 0.11 to 0.76 a w (solid square) at 25°C to 45°C (A) and reference T g data (solid circle) fromSilalai and Roos (2011) at room temperature (B) against water content and water activities (0.54-0.76 a w ) using the Gordon-Taylor equation. Data for T g of anhydrous lactose and water were fromPotes et al (2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, as amorphous solid has a kinetically frozen liquid-like structure and is not in a thermodynamic equilibrium state, amorphous materials exhibit increased molecular mobility and rapidly decreasing viscosity above the glass transition (Roos and Karel, 1991;Champion et al, 2000;Roudaut et al, 2004). Several studies have confirmed that stickiness was controlled by the glass transition (Hennigs et al, 2001;Ozmen and Langrish, 2002;Silalai and Roos, 2011a). Besides, changes in mechanical a-relaxations of milk solids/maltodextrin systems were also associated with powder stickiness, which was also as a result of increasing molecular mobility above the glass transition of powder components (Silalai and Roos, 2011b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sticky point was found for skim milk-milk protein solids systems to occur at increasing temperatures above the T g with rising protein content (Silalai and Roos 2010). The results also showed that although the T g was at an almost constant, a w -dependent temperature, stickiness developed at the higher temperature the higher was the protein content leading to a larger temperature difference between the sticky point and glass transition (Silalai and Roos 2011a). The α-relaxation time corresponding to the sticky point decreased with increasing a w , but there were increases in the temperature difference of the sticky point to T g with increasing a w .…”
Section: Dielectric and Mechanical Relaxations Of Food Solidsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…The α-relaxation time corresponding to the sticky point decreased with increasing a w , but there were increases in the temperature difference of the sticky point to T g with increasing a w . This could be related to a w -dependent interactions of the components in water-plasticised systems and availability of the carbohydrate phase for the formation of liquid bridges at particle surfaces (Silalai and Roos 2011a).…”
Section: Dielectric and Mechanical Relaxations Of Food Solidsmentioning
confidence: 99%