2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.compgeo.2021.104629
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coupling of material point and continuum discontinuum element methods for simulating blast-induced fractures in rock

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because the material point method is independent of mesh distortion and convective term treatment, it has advantages as a numerical tool in modeling large deformation problems. Consequently, the method has been used to simulate the behavior of rock fracture under blast loading [44,45]. The numerical modeling setup for the rock single-hole blasting model with static and dynamic coupling is shown in Figure 4a.…”
Section: Numerical Simulation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the material point method is independent of mesh distortion and convective term treatment, it has advantages as a numerical tool in modeling large deformation problems. Consequently, the method has been used to simulate the behavior of rock fracture under blast loading [44,45]. The numerical modeling setup for the rock single-hole blasting model with static and dynamic coupling is shown in Figure 4a.…”
Section: Numerical Simulation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where fracture energy, Young's modulus, shear modulus, Poisson's ratio, and tensile strength, The procedure of the explicit scheme for the CDEM is not presented here; interested readers are referred to Yue et al 53 for a recent overview.…”
Section: Computational Model Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can be calculated from the stiffness value based on the theory of material strength in molecular mechanics and material fracturing as 52 {kngoodbreak=Eσtrue¯T4GfIksgoodbreak=Gσtrue¯T4GfIIGgoodbreak=E2()1goodbreak+ν where kn, ks, GfI, GfII, E, G, ν, and σtrue¯T are the normal stiffness, shear stiffness, mode I fracture energy, mode II fracture energy, Young's modulus, shear modulus, Poisson's ratio, and tensile strength, respectively. The procedure of the explicit scheme for the CDEM is not presented here; interested readers are referred to Yue et al 53 for a recent overview.…”
Section: Numerical Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model is a granite disk with radius 72 mm and a hole with a radius 3.225 mm, which is filled with PETN (Pentaerythritol Tetranitrate) [38], as a plane stress condition. The material parameters are taken based on [39]; see Table 1 and the parameter for explosive is listed in Table 2. In total, 39,480 triangular elements and 59,672 interface elements are created in the numerical model.…”
Section: Single Hole Blasting Testmentioning
confidence: 99%