SPE Improved Oil Recovery Symposium 2012
DOI: 10.2118/154083-ms
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coupling of Stress Dependent Relative Permeability and Reservoir Simulation

Abstract: Geomechanics is increasingly being considered for inclusion in reservoir simulation, since conventional simulators do not honor deformation resulting from the interaction between stress and fluid flow response in a porous medium.When a reservoir responds to changes in effective stress, the bulk volume adjusts, changing the pore geometry and dependent parameters like porosity, absolute permeability and effective permeability, and phase saturations. Most of the recently developed sequentially coupled approaches … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7. The Ofagbohunmi et al model (2012) (Ofagbohunmi et al 2012) is an empirical relationship between the S wir and the normalized porosity during compaction. In Li et al model (Li et al 2010), the irreducible water saturation simulations were conducted on tight sandstone samples with the initial porosity (ϕ) of 6.17%, initial permeability (K) of 0.0951 × 10 −3 μm 2 and the initial Fig.…”
Section: Fig 4 the Irreducible Water Saturation Calculated By Differmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…7. The Ofagbohunmi et al model (2012) (Ofagbohunmi et al 2012) is an empirical relationship between the S wir and the normalized porosity during compaction. In Li et al model (Li et al 2010), the irreducible water saturation simulations were conducted on tight sandstone samples with the initial porosity (ϕ) of 6.17%, initial permeability (K) of 0.0951 × 10 −3 μm 2 and the initial Fig.…”
Section: Fig 4 the Irreducible Water Saturation Calculated By Differmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5 The flow diagram of the apparatus for irreducible water saturation measurements Fig. 7 The comparison between the newly developed model and other models (Lei et al 2015;Li et al 2010;Ofagbohunmi et al 2012) irreducible water saturation of 9.8%. In Lei et al model (2015) (Lei et al 2015), the initial porosity ϕ = 6.17%, the Euclidean dimension d = 2, the initial irreducible water saturation S wc0 = 9.8%, rock Poisson's ratio ν = 0.25, and the rock elastic modulus E = 1.05 × 10 3 MPa.…”
Section: Fig 4 the Irreducible Water Saturation Calculated By Differmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since capillary pressure allows us to capture the pore size and wettability effect, as well as to identify phase trapping and the endpoints of relative permeability, we have modified the form of the empirical functions developed by Khan (), Hamoud et al (), and Ojagbohunmi et al () to derive the following equations to describe the relationship between the endpoints of geo‐dynamic relative permeability and the geodynamic capillary pressure: Swir()t=Swir()12.15+13.15()PctPc; Snwr()t=Snwr()2.75+3.75()PctPc; Krwmax()t=Krwmax()38.5237.52()PcPct;and Krnwmax()t=Krnwmax()1.0010.001()PcPct. …”
Section: Derivation Of Semi‐analytical Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While Khan (2009), Hamoud et al (2012, and Ojagbohunmi et al (2012) have presented empirical functions relating porosity change fraction and relative permeability endpoints for Canadian oil sands, similar relationships are required for carbonates. As discussed previously, two lab experimental programs on naturally fractured carbonate undertaken by McDonald et al (1991) and Lian et al (2012) provided opposite results in terms of the changes to irreducible water saturation with compaction.…”
Section: 1029/2018wr024042mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This non-linear coupling impacts the flow capacity of the porous medium due to stressinduced changes in the porous void structure, what becomes manifest by an alteration of the rock permeability. An illustrative simulation has shown, that the impact of non including this coupling in hydrocarbon recovery, is that an overestimation of about 10% of the total oil recovery in a reservoir can appear [1]. In order to study the flow-stress coupling phenomenon, laboratory work in triaxial cells has been worldwide performed along the time using cores of diverse rock types and structures, various fluids and diverse confining stresses and pore pressures [2][3][4][5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%