Thin-layer chromatography (TLC) is a widely used, fast and inexpensive method. Even minor constituents of complex mixtures can be often characterized. Unfortunately, the unambiguous assignment of the spots to defined compounds is often difficult because common staining methods normally reveal only (at best) a substance class, not a specific compound. For instance, in the case of phospholipids, the lipid class, but not the detailed fatty acyl composition, can be determined (normal phase TLC). Nowadays mass spectrometry (MS) seems to be the most suitable method for analyte characterization due to its high sensitivity and mass accuracy. This became possible by the invention of soft ionization methods such as matrix-assisted laser desorption and ionization time-of-flight (MALDI-TOF) MS and electrospray ionization (ESI) although many further desorption techniques are available nowadays. This review summarizes the so far available knowledge about direct TLC/MS couplings and gives an overview about selected compounds that could be successfully analyzed.
Chromatographic Methods and Product IdentificationLiquid chromatographic methods, especially high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) and planar chromatography [in particular thin-layer (TLC) or highperformance thin-layer chromatography (HPTLC)], are indispensable tools of modern analytical chemistry (Hahn-Deinstrop 2006 l TLC is a very robust system and to a much lesser extent affected by impurities potentially present in the sample. Thus, TLC may also be used for the analysis of "suspicious" samples (for instance, crude tissue or food extracts) that might easily damage or plug the column of an HPLC system. l HPLC columns are normally rather expensive and are, thus, many times reused subsequent to careful washing to remove previous analytes. However, it can never be completely ruled out that there is some residual material on the column. Thus, it is often more difficult to certify an HPLC assay than a TLC assay because TLC does not provide any "memory" effects as a completely new stationary phase is used in all cases. The consumption of solvents is much lower than in the case of HPLC. This makes TLC less expensive and particularly less harmful and more environment friendly.l Although nowadays there are also "multiplexing" HPLC systems available (Woodbury et al. 1995) that allow the simultaneous analysis of several samples in parallel, the simple analysis of a multitude of samples is also a clear advantage of TLC.There is hardly a class of small molecules that have not yet been analyzed by TLC, and thus this review will not deal with improvements of the achievable separation quality, neither by optimizing the stationary phase nor the solvent system nor sample application.However, separation is only one (unequivocally very important) step of successful analysis, and the detection of the different analytes on the TLC plate and their structural elucidation is also very important. This particularly holds because the retardation factor (R f value) by which a com...