2019
DOI: 10.5846/stxb201811082426
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coupling relationship between urban spatial expansion and landscape ecological risk in Nanchang City

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, we constructed an assessment model based on the landscape pattern index to investigate the correlation between land use change and landscape ecological risk, providing an efficient and convenient procedure for assessing the spatial and temporal variability characteristics of LER. The assessment model has been widely used for evaluation of LER caused by land use change [57,58]. The LER pattern in the Yuanmou Basin has obvious spatial differentiation characteristics, with an overall trend of high in the center and low in the surroundings, which can be related to the distribution of different land use types.…”
Section: Landscape Ecological Risks In Response To Land Use Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, we constructed an assessment model based on the landscape pattern index to investigate the correlation between land use change and landscape ecological risk, providing an efficient and convenient procedure for assessing the spatial and temporal variability characteristics of LER. The assessment model has been widely used for evaluation of LER caused by land use change [57,58]. The LER pattern in the Yuanmou Basin has obvious spatial differentiation characteristics, with an overall trend of high in the center and low in the surroundings, which can be related to the distribution of different land use types.…”
Section: Landscape Ecological Risks In Response To Land Use Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The landscape fragility index is classified into six grades: unused land = 6, waters = 5, arable land = 4, grassland = 3, forestland = 2, urban and rural residential land = 1, other construction lands = 1 (Wang et al, 2019).…”
Section: Landscape Fragility Index F I Obtained By Experts Assignmen...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1) Determination of the evaluation unit of the study area Through the Fishnet Analysis tool in ArcGIS 10.8, taking into account the study area's extent and the patch areas of different landscape types, following the 2-5 times principle based on patch size [42][43][44], the study area is divided into 243 square grid cells of 10 km×10 km each using an equidistant method. A risk index is then constructed to determine the risk value at the center point of each landscape unit, which is utilized to calculate the landscape ecological security index (Fig 3).…”
Section: Landscape Loss Degree Index (R I )mentioning
confidence: 99%