2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2016.09.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coupling the short-term global forecast system weather data with a variable source area hydrologic model

Abstract: Few current modeling tools are designed to predict short-term, high-risk runoff from hydrologically sensitive areas (HSAs) in watersheds. This study couples the Soil and Water Assessment Tool-Variable Source Area model with the Climate Forecast System Reanalysis model and the Global Forecast System-Model Output Statistics model short term weather forecast, to develop a HSA prediction tool designed to assist producers, landowners, and planners in identifying high-risk areas generating storm runoff and pollution… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…End users have reported dissatisfaction with the general nature of nutrient management recommendations (Osmond et al, 2012), which often do not connect to specific best management practices and do not support daily, operational decisions that reflect antecedent conditions and weather (Buda et al, 2013). Persistent improvements to Chesapeake Bay state P indices (Sharpley et al, 2017), new conservation planning tools that target best management practices to vulnerable areas in watersheds (Tomer et al, 2015), and new decision support tools that use short‐term weather forecasts (Easton et al, 2017a; Sommerlot et al, 2017) all support improved assessment and management of P critical source areas.…”
Section: Southeastern Pennsylvaniamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…End users have reported dissatisfaction with the general nature of nutrient management recommendations (Osmond et al, 2012), which often do not connect to specific best management practices and do not support daily, operational decisions that reflect antecedent conditions and weather (Buda et al, 2013). Persistent improvements to Chesapeake Bay state P indices (Sharpley et al, 2017), new conservation planning tools that target best management practices to vulnerable areas in watersheds (Tomer et al, 2015), and new decision support tools that use short‐term weather forecasts (Easton et al, 2017a; Sommerlot et al, 2017) all support improved assessment and management of P critical source areas.…”
Section: Southeastern Pennsylvaniamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Corroboration of Virginia's Saturated Area Forecast Model Tool has primarily focused on hydrologic predictions. For instance, Sommerlot et al (2016) evaluated model performance in predicting streamflow and the extent of saturated areas within the South Fork of the Shenandoah River, a 2600‐km 2 mixed‐land‐use watershed in North‐Central Virginia. Field‐level hydrologic forecasts of saturated area extent (3‐m resolution) were compared with observed saturated areas mapped on two occasions in December 2015, with results demonstrating a true positive rate of 0.86 and a false positive rate of 0.25.…”
Section: Forecast‐driven Decision Support Systemsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Saturation excess runoff generation from soils with shallow restrictive layers at lower landscape positions (e.g., VSAs) accounts for the majority of surface runoff. This location was chosen as a proof of concept test bed based on the success of the short-term hydrologic forecast framework recently tested here [22]. Setup and calibration procedures are described in [22], resulting in a model which satisfactorily forecasted the streamflow response and distributed soil saturation classifications in the watershed [22,34].…”
Section: Proof Of Concept Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SWAT-VSA is forced with dynamic meteorological forecasts to produce a 24-96 h distributed hydrologic forecast described in [22]. The DSS downloads and parses meteorological data from the GFS-MOS forecast dataset every six hours.…”
Section: Swat-vsa Model Componentmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation