2016
DOI: 10.2340/16501977-2057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Course and predictors of pain and physical functioning in patients with hip osteoarthritis: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract: Because of high heterogeneity across studies and within study populations, no conclusions can be drawn with regard to the course of pain and physical functioning. Several clinical characteristics, health behaviours and psychosocial factors prognosticate deterioration of pain and physical functioning. These findings may guide future research aimed at the identification of subgroups of patients with hip osteoarthritis.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
45
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
2
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thousands of prognostic factor research studies are published within the medical literature each year (Altman & Riley, 2005;Riley et al, 2013). A large number of these cohort studies have focused on identifying predictors of outcome within a MSK context, including for specific MSK conditions such as low back pain, shoulder pain and hip pain, with well conducted systematic reviews summarising agreement on the most important predictive factors (Kooijman et al, 2015;de Rooij et al, 2016;Struyf, Geeraerts, Noten, Meeus, & Nijs, 2016;Verkerk, Luijsterburg, Miedema, Pool-Goudzwaard, & Koes, 2012). Predictive patient factors emerging from these reviews include: symptom duration, disability level, previous episode, pain severity, baseline function and level of comorbidity (Kooijman et al, 2015;de Rooij et al, 2016;Struyf et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thousands of prognostic factor research studies are published within the medical literature each year (Altman & Riley, 2005;Riley et al, 2013). A large number of these cohort studies have focused on identifying predictors of outcome within a MSK context, including for specific MSK conditions such as low back pain, shoulder pain and hip pain, with well conducted systematic reviews summarising agreement on the most important predictive factors (Kooijman et al, 2015;de Rooij et al, 2016;Struyf, Geeraerts, Noten, Meeus, & Nijs, 2016;Verkerk, Luijsterburg, Miedema, Pool-Goudzwaard, & Koes, 2012). Predictive patient factors emerging from these reviews include: symptom duration, disability level, previous episode, pain severity, baseline function and level of comorbidity (Kooijman et al, 2015;de Rooij et al, 2016;Struyf et al, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although, in our study, obesity did not demonstrate a statistically significant association with pain interference in our adjusted models, it resulted in a highest adjusted PAR (8.4%), although this was not statistically significant. On this basis, and given previous research findings (Chapple et al, 2011;de Rooij et al, 2016;Messier et al, 2018;Muthuri, Hui, Doherty, & Zhang, 2011), we recognize that weight loss should feature as a core recommendation as part of preventative strategies for joint pain and OA (National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The potential confounders available in the self‐report survey data were scrutinized carefully, in order to select those that had previously been shown to relate to outcomes of joint pain and pain interference (Chapple et al, ; de Rooij et al, ; Nicholls et al, ), and/or were related to pain interference in this particular study sample. However, not all important confounders would have been fully measured and accounted for (e.g., a detailed history of occupational workload, other relevant comorbidities), and a number of those measured may have been subject to some degree of measurement error (e.g., self‐reported measures of physical activity and body weight).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations