Constitutional Law and Precedent 2022
DOI: 10.4324/9781003264262-14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Court of Justice of the European Union—‘stone-by-stone' case-based reasoning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 Many questions in relation to its application have also had to be settled by the Court of Justice, particularly with regard to the risks that it can pose for the protection of fundamental rights in the area of freedom, security and justice (hereafter AFSJ). In this regard, the Court of Justice adopted a 'stone-by-stone approach', 3 by progressively specifying the limits framing the principle of mutual trust, on the basis of the specific cases it had to handle. In order to fully comprehend the scope of the principle of mutual trust in the AFSJ, it is thus imperative to conduct an intersectoral review of the most significant Court's judgments shaping this principle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 Many questions in relation to its application have also had to be settled by the Court of Justice, particularly with regard to the risks that it can pose for the protection of fundamental rights in the area of freedom, security and justice (hereafter AFSJ). In this regard, the Court of Justice adopted a 'stone-by-stone approach', 3 by progressively specifying the limits framing the principle of mutual trust, on the basis of the specific cases it had to handle. In order to fully comprehend the scope of the principle of mutual trust in the AFSJ, it is thus imperative to conduct an intersectoral review of the most significant Court's judgments shaping this principle.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%