2006
DOI: 10.2981/0909-6396(2006)12[367:cobbua]2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Courtship of brown bears Ursus arctos in northern Spain: phenology, weather, habitat and durable mating areas

Abstract: During 1988-2004 we made 297 non-systematic direct observations of freeranging brown bears Ursus arctos in the Cantabrian Range of Spain, one of the southernmost and most endangered populations in Europe. Observations were distributed over the whole calendar year, with records in every month. We classified 23 observations as breeding behaviour (male-female close interactions). They occurred between 17 April and 12 June, but mainly from the second week of May to the first week of June, both included. Matings (N… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
33
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, it shows a steep increase during the spring months, April to June. This increase in productivity coincides with the moment when females with newborn cubs usually leave the den , and with the mating season (Ferna´ndez-Gil et al 2006). Third, ecosystem functioning shows a pronounced maximum in summer and early autumn (June-September).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Second, it shows a steep increase during the spring months, April to June. This increase in productivity coincides with the moment when females with newborn cubs usually leave the den , and with the mating season (Ferna´ndez-Gil et al 2006). Third, ecosystem functioning shows a pronounced maximum in summer and early autumn (June-September).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Marking and rubbing in bears are a ubiquitous, but still poorly understood, aspect of the species' behavior (Green and Mattson 2003;Karamanlidis et al 2007). The greater marking and rubbing activity of brown bears in our study area coincided with the mating season of the species in these latitudes (Fernandez-Gil et al 2006) and was most probably associated with it. Similar behavior has been also suggested for grizzly bears in North America (Green and Mattson 2003) and other carnivore species (Schmidt and Kowalczyk 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…These broad sampling periods were defined considering the general activity and Fig. 1 Map of the southern Balkans indicating the locations of the six study areas in Albania, the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia (FYROM), and Greece (Florina, Grammos, Grevena, Trikala), the power poles inspected, and the poles that were used as sampling stations for genetic sampling Table 1 Number of power poles used in six networks for genetic sampling and their intensity of use by brown bears (I: low rubbing activity; II: low marking activity; III: medium marking and rubbing activity; IV: heavy marking activity; V: heavy marking and rubbing activity; see Karamanlidis et al 2007 andKaramanlidis 2008 N/100 km 2 is a density index of the sampling network, calculated as the number of sampling power poles divided by the size of the study area in 100 km 2 Table 1 Number of power poles used in six networks for genetic sampling and their intensity of use by brown bears (I: low rubbing activity; II: low marking activity; III: medium marking and rubbing activity; IV: heavy marking activity; V: heavy marking and rubbing activity; see Karamanlidis et al 2007 andKaramanlidis 2008 for more information on these categories) in the southern Balkans (April-May 2008) habitat use patterns of brown bears in these latitudes (Huber and Roth 1992;Mertzanis et al 2005Mertzanis et al , 2008Fernandez-Gil et al 2006), taking into account specific environmental conditions in Greece. During mild winters, some bears in the country appear to be active and have been recorded to mark and rub on power poles throughout the winter (Karamanlidis 2008).…”
Section: Pilot Study Areamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This mechanism was suggested by spatial analyses indicating that, in northern Europe, neighbouring females have the ability to influence the likelihood of reproduction among each other [22]. This effect might be enhanced at high densities and by behavioural syndromes favouring spatial aggregation, like the repeated use of specific reproductive areas [34] and philopatric behaviour favouring that females remain close to their natal home range [35].…”
Section: (A) Reproductionmentioning
confidence: 97%