Abstract:Coronaviruses constitute a family of viruses that gives rise to respiratory diseases. COVID-19 is an infectious disease caused by a newly discovered coronavirus also termed Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2). As COVID-19 is highly contagious, early diagnosis of COVID-19 is crucial for an effective treatment strategy. However, the reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test which is considered to be a gold standard in the diagnosis of COVID-19 suffers from a high fals… Show more
“…Most previous methods divided the dataset into various ratios of training, testing, and validation, while other methods used cross‐validation. While considering cross‐validation, the preceding studies analyzed 10‐fold [44,49,67,70], 5‐fold [31,32,50,77,79], and 4‐fold [45] cross‐validation. Compared to 4‐fold cross‐validation, 10‐fold and 5‐fold cross‐validation provide better results.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the previous studies [88] used Inception, and its AUC reached 100%. The sensitivity of feature extraction using NASNet‐Large [38] is 100%, while the F1‐score using the COV‐ELM [70] method is 95%. In addition, in terms of accuracy, NASNetMobile [26] scored the highest, reaching 100%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, in [111], the authors incorporated CNN with k‐nearest neighbors (k‐NN) and a support estimator network, but it requires a lot of data to train. In the study [70], the authors applied the COV‐ELM classifier, which applies an extreme learning machine (ELM) to classify COVID‐19 from chest X‐rays and adjust the network with minimum interference, thereby reducing training time. An end‐to‐end web‐based detection system with a bagging trees classifier was promoted to simulate the digital clinical pipeline and facilitate the screening of suspicious cases in [49].…”
Background: Due to the limited availability and high cost of the reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test, many studies have proposed machine learning techniques for detecting COVID-19 from medical imaging. The purpose of this study is to systematically review, assess and synthesize research articles that have used different machine learning techniques to detect and diagnose COVID-19 from chest X-ray and CT scan images. Methods: A structured literature search was conducted in the relevant bibliographic databases to ensure that the survey solely centered on reproducible and high-quality research. We selected papers based on our inclusion criteria. Results: In this survey, we reviewed 98 articles that fulfilled our inclusion criteria. We have surveyed a complete pipeline of chest imaging analysis techniques related to COVID-19, including data collection, pre-processing, feature extraction, classification, and visualization. We have considered CT scans and X-rays as both are widely used to describe the latest developments in medical imaging to detect COVID-19. Conclusions: This survey provides researchers with valuable insights into different machine learning techniques and their performance in the detection and diagnosis of COVID-19 from chest imaging. At the end, the challenges and limitations in detecting COVID-19 using machine learning techniques and the future direction of research are discussed.
“…Most previous methods divided the dataset into various ratios of training, testing, and validation, while other methods used cross‐validation. While considering cross‐validation, the preceding studies analyzed 10‐fold [44,49,67,70], 5‐fold [31,32,50,77,79], and 4‐fold [45] cross‐validation. Compared to 4‐fold cross‐validation, 10‐fold and 5‐fold cross‐validation provide better results.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One of the previous studies [88] used Inception, and its AUC reached 100%. The sensitivity of feature extraction using NASNet‐Large [38] is 100%, while the F1‐score using the COV‐ELM [70] method is 95%. In addition, in terms of accuracy, NASNetMobile [26] scored the highest, reaching 100%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, in [111], the authors incorporated CNN with k‐nearest neighbors (k‐NN) and a support estimator network, but it requires a lot of data to train. In the study [70], the authors applied the COV‐ELM classifier, which applies an extreme learning machine (ELM) to classify COVID‐19 from chest X‐rays and adjust the network with minimum interference, thereby reducing training time. An end‐to‐end web‐based detection system with a bagging trees classifier was promoted to simulate the digital clinical pipeline and facilitate the screening of suspicious cases in [49].…”
Background: Due to the limited availability and high cost of the reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test, many studies have proposed machine learning techniques for detecting COVID-19 from medical imaging. The purpose of this study is to systematically review, assess and synthesize research articles that have used different machine learning techniques to detect and diagnose COVID-19 from chest X-ray and CT scan images. Methods: A structured literature search was conducted in the relevant bibliographic databases to ensure that the survey solely centered on reproducible and high-quality research. We selected papers based on our inclusion criteria. Results: In this survey, we reviewed 98 articles that fulfilled our inclusion criteria. We have surveyed a complete pipeline of chest imaging analysis techniques related to COVID-19, including data collection, pre-processing, feature extraction, classification, and visualization. We have considered CT scans and X-rays as both are widely used to describe the latest developments in medical imaging to detect COVID-19. Conclusions: This survey provides researchers with valuable insights into different machine learning techniques and their performance in the detection and diagnosis of COVID-19 from chest imaging. At the end, the challenges and limitations in detecting COVID-19 using machine learning techniques and the future direction of research are discussed.
“…They show that the implementation of parallel versions of the algorithm in the C language with the OpenBLAS, Intel MKL, and MAGMA libraries is more advantageous compared to the reference version of MATLAB. Afterward, Rajpal et al [106] addressed the problem of ELM-based COVID-19 classification (COV-ELM) into three classes: (1) COVID-19, (2) normal, and (3) pneumonia. The results showed that COV-ELM outperforms new-generation machine learning algorithms.…”
The randomization-based feedforward neural network has raised great interest in the scientific community due to its simplicity, training speed, and accuracy comparable to traditional learning algorithms. The basic algorithm consists of randomly determining the weights and biases of the hidden layer and analytically calculating the weights of the output layer by solving a linear overdetermined system using the Moore–Penrose generalized inverse. When processing large volumes of data, randomization-based feedforward neural network models consume large amounts of memory and drastically increase training time. To efficiently solve the above problems, parallel and distributed models have recently been proposed. Previous reviews of randomization-based feedforward neural network models have mainly focused on categorizing and describing the evolution of the algorithms presented in the literature. The main contribution of this paper is to approach the topic from the perspective of the handling of large volumes of data. In this sense, we present a current and extensive review of the parallel and distributed models of randomized feedforward neural networks, focusing on extreme learning machine. In particular, we review the mathematical foundations (Moore–Penrose generalized inverse and solution of linear systems using parallel and distributed methods) and hardware and software technologies considered in current implementations.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.