2017
DOI: 10.1002/biot.201700072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Covalent Binding of Bone Morphogenetic Protein‐2 and Transforming Growth Factor‐β3 to 3D Plotted Scaffolds for Osteochondral Tissue Regeneration

Abstract: Engineering the osteochondral tissue presents some challenges mainly relying in its function of transition from the subchondral bone to articular cartilage and the gradual variation in several biological, mechanical, and structural features. A possible solution for osteochondral regeneration might be the design and fabrication of scaffolds presenting a gradient able to mimic this transition. Covalent binding of biological factors proved to enhance cell adhesion and differentiation in two-dimensional culture su… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
0
38
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Di Luca et al explored covalent binding of GFs to additively manufactured 3D scaffolds [ 80 ]. Additively manufactured poly(ε-caprolactone) scaffolds were modified with functionalizable poly(oligo (ethylene glycol) methacrylate) (POEGMA) brushes, which were subsequently functionalized with BMP-2 and TGF-β3.…”
Section: Incorporation and Delivery Of Gfsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Di Luca et al explored covalent binding of GFs to additively manufactured 3D scaffolds [ 80 ]. Additively manufactured poly(ε-caprolactone) scaffolds were modified with functionalizable poly(oligo (ethylene glycol) methacrylate) (POEGMA) brushes, which were subsequently functionalized with BMP-2 and TGF-β3.…”
Section: Incorporation and Delivery Of Gfsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While covalent binding approaches have previously been used for growth factor delivery applications, the previous systems rely on the covalent binding of the growth factors themselves to the scaffold backbone. However, this method poses concerns due to the negative effects on protein bioactivity (Di Luca et al, ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second category of techniques that are based on the covalent binding of proteins to scaffolds lead to constant, sustained protein release profiles. These techniques fail to prevent the rapid degradation and loss of bioactivity of the protein (Di Luca et al, ). Finally, the incorporation of proteins into particles has shown great promise for controlled release and is able to both protect the protein and provide a delivery profile consisting of an initial burst release followed by a short, sustained release (Bessa et al, ; Subbiah et al, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…With EVs exhibiting a negative charge, this presents the potential to immobilise these nanoparticles within biomaterials via electrostatic interactions [ 123 ]. Conjugating EVs with the biomaterial via covalent modification would provide the strongest immobilisation method, which would eliminate burst release and prolong delivery, similar to what has been shown for growth factors [ 124 , 125 ]. In addition to controlling the EVs release kinetics, the mode of delivery is an essential consideration for biomaterial design.…”
Section: Ev-functionalised Biomaterialsmentioning
confidence: 99%