2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2006.12.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Covalent genomic DNA modification patterns revealed by denaturing gradient gel blots

Abstract: Several approaches are used to survey genomic DNA methylation patterns, including Southern blot, PCR, and microarray strategies. All of these methods are based on the use of methylation-sensitive isoschizomer restriction enzyme pairs and/or sodium bisulfite treatment of genomic DNA. They have many limitations, including PCR bias, lack of comprehensive assessment of methylated sites, laborintensive protocols, and/or the need for expensive equipment. Since the presence of 5-methylcytosine alters the melting prop… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…( 19 ) recently proposed that the differential stability of methylated versus non-methylated duplexes might be exploited to probe the amount of methylation in both specific genes and entire genomes in a smart and sensitive way. Indeed, substitution of methylcytosine for cytosine in the context of CpG repeats has been previously shown to enhance the double-strand stability during both thermal ( 20 22 ) and chemical denaturation ( 20 , 21 , 23 ). Notably, the results of Diede et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…( 19 ) recently proposed that the differential stability of methylated versus non-methylated duplexes might be exploited to probe the amount of methylation in both specific genes and entire genomes in a smart and sensitive way. Indeed, substitution of methylcytosine for cytosine in the context of CpG repeats has been previously shown to enhance the double-strand stability during both thermal ( 20 22 ) and chemical denaturation ( 20 , 21 , 23 ). Notably, the results of Diede et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CpG methylation has been suggested to alter the DNA secondary structure and melting properties (Laprise and Gray, 2007), which may impair PCR amplification (Kholod et al, 2007). However, to our knowledge, the interference of the differential methylation at imprinted regions in PCR amplification has never been reported.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Methylation status can alter the DNA secondary structure and melting properties 10 . Amplification is not prevented by methylation, but it is rather driven preferentially toward the unmethylated allele when the methylation status of the two alleles is distinct 11 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…T a = primer annealing temperature; PCR = polymerase chain reaction. Preferential engagement of the polymerase to a specific allele can have multiple causes, like differences in GC content between alleles, heterozygous variants in the primer region, methylation status or altered folding [8][9][10][11] . A different variant in the primer annealing site was excluded as a cause due to equivalent results when using different primer sets.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%