2022
DOI: 10.1039/d2nr03462j
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Covalent surface modification of bifunctional two-dimensional metal carbide MXenes as sulfur hosts for sodium–sulfur batteries

Abstract: Room temperature sodium-sulfur (RT Na-S) batteries show extraordinary potential in large-scale energy storage. MXenes have been demonstrated to be promising sulfur hosts for Na-S batteries, and their surface functional groups...

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to obtain the most stable conformations of N-, O-, F-, and OH-functionalized Ti 2 C, the energies of all their conformations were calculated as shown in Table S1. The most stable structures (the lowest energy structure) of Ti 2 CO 2 , Ti 2 CF 2 , and Ti 2 C­(OH) 2 were observed in configuration I, while Ti 2 CN 2 preferred configuration III, which is consistent with previous research. We find that the terminal functional group type of Ti 2 C can significantly affect its structural characteristics. The obtained lattice constants for Ti 2 CN 2 , Ti 2 CO 2 , Ti 2 CF 2 , and Ti 2 C­(OH) 2 were 3.210, 3.018, 3.036, and 3.052 Å, and their corresponding thicknesses were 3.776, 4.439, 4.795, and 6.791 Å, respectively.…”
Section: Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In order to obtain the most stable conformations of N-, O-, F-, and OH-functionalized Ti 2 C, the energies of all their conformations were calculated as shown in Table S1. The most stable structures (the lowest energy structure) of Ti 2 CO 2 , Ti 2 CF 2 , and Ti 2 C­(OH) 2 were observed in configuration I, while Ti 2 CN 2 preferred configuration III, which is consistent with previous research. We find that the terminal functional group type of Ti 2 C can significantly affect its structural characteristics. The obtained lattice constants for Ti 2 CN 2 , Ti 2 CO 2 , Ti 2 CF 2 , and Ti 2 C­(OH) 2 were 3.210, 3.018, 3.036, and 3.052 Å, and their corresponding thicknesses were 3.776, 4.439, 4.795, and 6.791 Å, respectively.…”
Section: Results and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In addition, the incorporation of TMs also strengthens the adsorption of NaPSs on the Ti 2 CS 2 substrate. The binding energies of soluble Na 2 S 8 (2.54–2.99 eV), Na 2 S 6 (2.80–3.29 eV), and Na 2 S 4 (3.18–3.85 eV) on these four TM@Ti 2 CS 2 catalysts are dramatically larger than that on DOL and DME (0.50–0.65 eV), 64 manifesting that these four TM@Ti 2 CS 2 -based sulfur hosts can effectively suppress the shuttle effect in Na–S batteries. Moreover, all four TM@Ti 2 CS 2 catalysts exhibit increasingly stronger affinity toward NaPSs with increased sodiation, and the binding energies of Na 2 S on them are the largest.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…Recently, MXenes have been reported to enhance the cycling stability of sodium metal anodes by improving the sodium metal deposition behavior. 18,25,26 Among the MXene family, Ti 3 C 2 T x has gained significant popularity owing to its high electrical conductivity, large interlayer spacing and low Na + diffusion barrier. Furthermore, the surface of Ti 3 C 2 T x is functionalized with various groups (such as -F, -O) during the HF etching process, which makes Ti 3 C 2 T x sodiophilic to guide Na uniform deposition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, the surface of Ti 3 C 2 T x is functionalized with various groups (such as -F, -O) during the HF etching process, which makes Ti 3 C 2 T x sodiophilic to guide Na uniform deposition. [26][27][28][29][30] Owing to these advantages, Ti 3 C 2 T x has been investigated as a stable host for sodium metal anodes. 31,32 For example, Fang et al emphasized the role of -F and -O functional groups in promoting Na deposition by evaluating the adsorption energies of F-Na and O-Na.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%