2010
DOI: 10.1117/12.851880
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Covariance consistency for track initiation using Gauss-Hermite quadrature

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Precise details of the generation of these initial Gaussian PDFs is not treated in this paper. The reader is referred to the earlier paper of Horwood et al [23], which treats the initial orbit determination problem in space surveillance.…”
Section: Simulation Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Precise details of the generation of these initial Gaussian PDFs is not treated in this paper. The reader is referred to the earlier paper of Horwood et al [23], which treats the initial orbit determination problem in space surveillance.…”
Section: Simulation Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although more elaborate gravity models could be used, the model equation (23) is sufficiently nonlinear to challenge the proposed adaptive Gaussian sum filter.…”
Section: Simulation Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The correction step, while equally important, is addressed elsewhere. 7 We remark that the Gaussian assumption is usually well-preserved following a measurement update or a batch estimation procedure for orbit determination 18,19 (track initiation). It is the prediction step where one sees the most benefit from using a Gaussian sum due to the potentially long time gaps between updates and the need to propagate the uncertainty under a highly nonlinear dynamical model.…”
Section: Features Of the Proposed Gaussian Sum Filtermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…II.B], the Kalman filter update can be derived by choosing the gain to minimize the trace of the preposterior MSE matrix of a linear estimator. In other words, rather than starting out with the optimal gain given in (94), one decides that the filtering algorithm must update the state as (132) and one must find the value of W k that minimizes the trace of (133) where the conditioning on Z 1:(k−1) on the right-hand side was omitted for brevity. The left-hand side was expanded by substituting (132).…”
Section: B Derivation As a Preposterior Mse Matrixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In other words, rather than starting out with the optimal gain given in (94), one decides that the filtering algorithm must update the state as (132) and one must find the value of W k that minimizes the trace of (133) where the conditioning on Z 1:(k−1) on the right-hand side was omitted for brevity. The left-hand side was expanded by substituting (132). The estimate is "preposterior" in that the MSE matrix of an updated (posterior) estimate at time k given only the measurements up to time k − 1 is found.…”
Section: B Derivation As a Preposterior Mse Matrixmentioning
confidence: 99%