2007 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation 2007
DOI: 10.1109/cec.2007.4424501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Covariance matrix repairing in Gaussian based EDAs

Abstract: Abstract-Gaussian models are widely adopted in continuous Estimation of Distribution Algorithms (EDAs). In this paper, we analyze continuous EDAs and show that they don't always work because of computation error: covariance matrix of Gaussian model can be ill-posed and Gaussian based EDAs using full covariance matrix will fail under specific conditions. It is a universal problem that all existing Gaussian based EDAs using full covariance matrix suffer from. Through theoretical analysis with examples of simulat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Since evolutionary algorithms deploy selection based on rank or fitness, the assumption of the same distribution is not valid. This may be the reason as to why the literature research has resulted in only one previous approach [2]. There, the authors considered Gaussian based estimation of distribution algorithms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Since evolutionary algorithms deploy selection based on rank or fitness, the assumption of the same distribution is not valid. This may be the reason as to why the literature research has resulted in only one previous approach [2]. There, the authors considered Gaussian based estimation of distribution algorithms.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3]. While the approach in [2] resembles the Ledoit-Wolf estimator [3], it adapted the shrinkage intensity during the run.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Para o caso discreto, pode-se destacar: Baluja & Davies (1997), Pelikan & Mühlenbein (1999), Harik et al (2006), Shakya & McCall (2007), Gámez et al (2007), Santana et al (2010) e Li et al (2011). Já para o caso contínuo, pode-se citar: Sebag & Ducoulombier (1998), Gallagher et al (1999), Lu & Yao (2005), Dong & Yao (2007), Wierstra et al (2008), Dong & Yao (2008). Uma revisão sobre algoritmos de estimação de distribuição e uma compilação das propostas de algoritmos desenvolvidos até então podem ser encontradas em Pelikan et al (2002), Lozano (2006) e Armañanzas et al (2008).…”
Section: Considerações Iniciaisunclassified