2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2109.07330
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Covariant canonical formulations of classical field theories

Abstract: who established many original and profound results in pure mathematics which found important applications in physics to which he also contributed substantially by his work and his action. By his wonderful lectures he conveyed his broad knowledge while highlighting the essential points and casting the physical concepts in their appropriate mathematical setting. An outstanding, undogmatic and open-minded mathematician of great simplicity and generosity left us while leaving a lasting impression on all those who … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 195 publications
(555 reference statements)
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From a technical standpoint, we will employ covariant phase space methods [55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63] (see [64,65] for reviews) to describe the dynamics of fields in a (bounded) spacetime region M . For definiteness, we will take M to have the topology of a cylinder, with time-like boundary Γ (but generalizing the construction to the case of a null boundary should be reasonably straightforward).…”
Section: Jhep02(2022)172mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From a technical standpoint, we will employ covariant phase space methods [55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63] (see [64,65] for reviews) to describe the dynamics of fields in a (bounded) spacetime region M . For definiteness, we will take M to have the topology of a cylinder, with time-like boundary Γ (but generalizing the construction to the case of a null boundary should be reasonably straightforward).…”
Section: Jhep02(2022)172mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A has two components once pulled-back to Γ; imposing boundary conditions on a Lagrangian submanifold amounts to fixing just one of them. 65 In local inertial coordinates (t, x), 65 While we will ultimately be imposing boundary conditions on the components of the edge-frame-dressed connection A rad , we will here briefly explore the frame-(in)dependence of boundary conditions for the gaugedependent A, as the discussion applies in the same manner to A rad , but is notation wise simpler.…”
Section: Abelian Chern-simons Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here, Stokes' theorem was applied for the last equality, see reference [15] for the notation of the hypersurface integration measure. Thus, if the variation δϕ and its derivatives vanish at the boundary ∂Ω of Ω, the variation δS vanishes identically for all of these field configurations and so does its functional derivative with respect to ϕ, i.e.…”
Section: Some Reminders 21 Lagrangian Density Given By a Total Deriva...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a matter of fact, the general formulation [5][6][7][8][9] of Noether's first theorem states that there is a one-to-one correspondence between equivalence classes of (global) variational symmetries and equivalence classes of (on-shell) conserved currents. (For a review, see for instance references [9,15].) More precisely, two infinitesimal global symmetry transformations are considered to be equivalent if they differ by a gauge symmetry transformation and/or an "equation of motion symmetry transformation", i.e.…”
Section: Noether's First Theorem and Improvement Of Currentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These are equivalent. Although the form-canonical equations of the CCF are equivalent to modified De Donder-Weyl equations [8], the Poisson bracket of the CCF is not equivalent to it of the De Donder-Weyl theory [12,13]. Reference [10] introduced the generator of the CCF and studied it of the local Lorentz transformation of gravity in the first order formalism.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%