2023
DOI: 10.1002/chem.202300343
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cover Feature: Plenates: Anion‐Dependent Self‐Assembly of the Pyrrole Cage Encapsulating Silver(I) Clusters (Chem. Eur. J. 12/2023)

Abstract: The self‐assembly of 2,5‐diformylpyrrole, tris(2‐aminoethyl)amine, and silver(I) yielded a series of new cascade complexes or plenates, that is, cryptates incorporating Agnn+ clusters. The tripyrrolic cage is represented by a wooden chest hiding the treasure, which in the case of plenates, contains a pile of shiny silver atoms. In contrast, for cascade complexes, two precious metals lie next to anions shown as colorful gems. Obviously, such treasure cannot remain unprotected… More information can be found in t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, installing such a moiety within the metal-organic MIM framework would translate into the flexible behaviour of the assembly. Eventually, it was realised that such functionality could be acquired by using diiminopyrrole ligands, which were earlier used to construct molecular cages [78][79][80] and macrocyclic compounds. [81][82][83][84][85] A comparison of 1 and diiminopyrrole 2 reveals subtle but significant geometric differences (Scheme 1A).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, installing such a moiety within the metal-organic MIM framework would translate into the flexible behaviour of the assembly. Eventually, it was realised that such functionality could be acquired by using diiminopyrrole ligands, which were earlier used to construct molecular cages [78][79][80] and macrocyclic compounds. [81][82][83][84][85] A comparison of 1 and diiminopyrrole 2 reveals subtle but significant geometric differences (Scheme 1A).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%