2022
DOI: 10.1002/anie.202210191
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cover Picture: Linker Scissoring Strategy Enables Precise Shaping of Metal–Organic Frameworks for Chromatographic Separation (Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 37/2022)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…[11][12][13][14][15][16][17] Compared to traditional porous materials, the superior structural features of 2-D MOFs, such as high surface area, high porosity, high stability, adjustable pore size, and functionalized pore surface, make them benecial for the separation of important chemical raw materials, such as xylene isomers. [18][19][20][21][22][23] However, 2-D MOF nanosheets are too thin and easy to stack at random, which will block the pores that originally adsorb and separate gases, resulting in a reduced gas adsorption rate and separation efficiency. [24][25][26] Therefore, it is exceedingly essential and important to regulate the stacking modes of 2-D MOF nanosheets to improve the effect of gas adsorption and separation, which was largely neglected before.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[11][12][13][14][15][16][17] Compared to traditional porous materials, the superior structural features of 2-D MOFs, such as high surface area, high porosity, high stability, adjustable pore size, and functionalized pore surface, make them benecial for the separation of important chemical raw materials, such as xylene isomers. [18][19][20][21][22][23] However, 2-D MOF nanosheets are too thin and easy to stack at random, which will block the pores that originally adsorb and separate gases, resulting in a reduced gas adsorption rate and separation efficiency. [24][25][26] Therefore, it is exceedingly essential and important to regulate the stacking modes of 2-D MOF nanosheets to improve the effect of gas adsorption and separation, which was largely neglected before.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[23][24][25] Modulators are often used to create structural defects in the MOF synthesis process, such as missing cluster or linker defects. [26,27] Monodentate modulators such as monocarboxylic acid (e.g., formic, [28] acetic, [29] benzoic acids, and derivatives [30,31] ) have been found to control crystal nucleation and growth by competing for coordination; while, alkaline modulators (e.g., ethylenediamine, [32] triethylamine [33,34] ) tailor crystal morphology or category via the protonation/deprotonation balance. In addition, inorganic acids (HCl, [35] HNO 3 /HF [36] ) have been found to accelerate the synthesis kinetics.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Metal‐organic frameworks (MOFs) having high tunability [ 5–26 ] along with structural diversity [ 27–51 ] claim immense attention toward sensing due to their versatile superiority such as quick response time, high sensitivity and selectivity, operability, and recyclability. [ 40,52–53 ] However, cationic MOFs having distinct advantages over neutral MOFs received considerable attention for selective trapping of targeted anions as they can act as readily anion exchangeable hosts and provide room for the substitutable anions inside the charged and nanosized pores cavity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%