2009
DOI: 10.1145/1456202.1456209
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

COVER STORYThe washing machine that ate my sari---mistakes in cross-cultural design

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
26
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
26
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Protecting delicate cloth and cleanliness (especially on shirt collars and pant cuffs) were motivating factors for this decision. Saris and embroidered Salwar Kameez, the most common clothes worn by Indian women, can at times be damaged if washed using a washing machine [10].…”
Section: Washing Clothesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Protecting delicate cloth and cleanliness (especially on shirt collars and pant cuffs) were motivating factors for this decision. Saris and embroidered Salwar Kameez, the most common clothes worn by Indian women, can at times be damaged if washed using a washing machine [10].…”
Section: Washing Clothesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Design for the BoP and related methodologies are a subset of DfX meant to help designers create products that sustainably improve the livelihood of people who do not have their needs met [15]. Similar strategies, which have the same goal but approach it from different perspectives, include the Product Service System approach [3], Design for Extreme Affordability [25] and Design for the Bottom of the Pyramid [12,26].…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prahalad estimates that the 4 billion people who have an income of $2 or less a day represent approximately 5 trillion in purchasing power parity [4]. Nongovernmental Organizations (NGOs) have traditionally worked in this sector and continue to develop products aimed at improv-Product failures can be attributed to many factors, but design literature points to a fundamental misunderstanding of the users [1,12]. This type of failure is common, perhaps as Bonsepe suggests inevitable, during remote design when the users are geographically separated from the designer [15,16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations