GLOBECOM 2017 - 2017 IEEE Global Communications Conference 2017
DOI: 10.1109/glocom.2017.8254658
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coverage Analysis for Low-Altitude UAV Networks in Urban Environments

Abstract: Abstract-Wireless access points on unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) are being considered for mobile service provisioning in commercial networks. To be able to efficiently use these devices in cellular networks it is necessary to first have a qualitative and quantitative understanding of how their design parameters reflect on the service quality experienced by the end user. In this paper we set up a scenario where a network of UAVs operating at a certain height above ground provide wireless service within covera… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
84
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 94 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
84
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors calculate optimal flying trajectories for a fixed‐wing drone that has to maintain communication with a stationary ground station. Galkin et al derive analytic formulas for an optimal altitude of a randomly moving network of drones to maximize the coverage probability for the stationary user.…”
Section: Planning Drone Operationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The authors calculate optimal flying trajectories for a fixed‐wing drone that has to maintain communication with a stationary ground station. Galkin et al derive analytic formulas for an optimal altitude of a randomly moving network of drones to maximize the coverage probability for the stationary user.…”
Section: Planning Drone Operationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because data transmission and setup operations to establish links consume the energy of drones, a common objective function is to maximize energy efficiency or minimize energy to achieve the desired communication quality . Alternatively, the number of established communication links and the quality of communication , such as packet transmission delay or the coverage probability , should be optimized given limited resources, such as the limited energy of the drone.…”
Section: Planning Drone Operationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We assume that each UAV has the same type of directional antenna with beamwidth θ 0 , and the main beam covers the region directly beneath the UAV. This coverage cone has a radius 3 tan( θ 0 2 )H. The interference beyond this coverage is negligible [27], [29]. As show in Fig.…”
Section: Air-to-ground (A2g) Channel Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Update z a(l,t) := z a(l,t) + 1, ∀(l, t) ∈ V(s −m )\V(s m ); 10 Based on (30), update the vertex reward k (z k ), ∀k ∈ K; H Altitude of the UAV 90 m [9] θ0 Antenna beamwidth 2.7854 rad [27], [29] fc Carrier frequency 2 GHz [9] N0 Noise power −96 dBm [9] α Path-loss exponent 2 [38] η1, η2 Path-loss for LOS, NLOS 3, 23 dB [9], [38] ψ, ζ Environment parameters 11.95, 0.14 [38] Λ0, Λ1, Λ2 Rotary-wing UAV physical property 580.65, 790.67, 0.01 [20] ω Tip speed of the rotor blade 200 m/s [20] χ Mean rotor induced velocity in hovering (see Equation (2.12) in [39] and Equation (12.1) of [40]) 7.2 [20] V. PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS…”
Section: B Distributed Route Selection Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The system-level analysis of UAV-assisted networks has also attracted much attention in recent literature. For instance, references [12], [13] and [15] considered a two dimensional (2D) PPP UAVassisted cellular network, where UAVs were distributed according to a PPP at the same height in the air.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%