2019
DOI: 10.1109/lcomm.2019.2942919
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coverage Analysis of Cooperative NOMA in Millimeter Wave Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…At mmWave frequencies, the LOS path is usually very strong compared with the non-LOS (NLOS) paths. In general, NLOS paths experience more than 20 dB loss compared with the LOS [7]. Further, a link of distance d can be considered as LOS with probability e −ζd , where ζ = µE[Z]/π represents a blockage parameter with µ and E[Z] as the blockage density and average perimeter of blockage objects, respectively [7], [21].…”
Section: System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…At mmWave frequencies, the LOS path is usually very strong compared with the non-LOS (NLOS) paths. In general, NLOS paths experience more than 20 dB loss compared with the LOS [7]. Further, a link of distance d can be considered as LOS with probability e −ζd , where ζ = µE[Z]/π represents a blockage parameter with µ and E[Z] as the blockage density and average perimeter of blockage objects, respectively [7], [21].…”
Section: System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, NLOS paths experience more than 20 dB loss compared with the LOS [7]. Further, a link of distance d can be considered as LOS with probability e −ζd , where ζ = µE[Z]/π represents a blockage parameter with µ and E[Z] as the blockage density and average perimeter of blockage objects, respectively [7], [21]. We assume the directional beamforming at each of the transmitting and receiving nodes.…”
Section: System Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations