1992
DOI: 10.1016/0039-6028(92)90731-k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coverage-dependent adsorption sites in the K/Ru(0001) system: a low-energy electron-diffraction analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, the energy splitting is smaller for K/Cu(111) compared to K/Ag(111), and substrate rumpling can change it in favor of the top site for K/Cu(111). This argument would also hold for the system K/Ru(0001) 26 which behaves similar to K/Ag(111). The calculations thus support the argument given, for example, in reference 2 and which was based on a large set of experimental data (when varying the adsorbate, the ratio of the radius of the adsorbate to the nearest neighbor spacing of the substrate was recommended as a parameter to predict the adsorption site).…”
Section: Comparison Of the Results For The Two Coveragesmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Thus, the energy splitting is smaller for K/Cu(111) compared to K/Ag(111), and substrate rumpling can change it in favor of the top site for K/Cu(111). This argument would also hold for the system K/Ru(0001) 26 which behaves similar to K/Ag(111). The calculations thus support the argument given, for example, in reference 2 and which was based on a large set of experimental data (when varying the adsorbate, the ratio of the radius of the adsorbate to the nearest neighbor spacing of the substrate was recommended as a parameter to predict the adsorption site).…”
Section: Comparison Of the Results For The Two Coveragesmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…A SEXAFS 0.15-0.30 0.5-1.00 0.30 ± 0.03 [34,35] diffuse LEED study of K/Ni(100) also determined that both the adsorption site and the K-Ni bondlength remained essentially constant in the coverage range from 0.08 to 0.50 [40]. No significant change in bondlength was observed for Na [41] , K [42] or Rb [43] on Ru(0001) between the p(2 × 2) and (…”
Section: Chemisorption Bondlengthmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Substitutional adsorption has been shown in three cases to occur as the result of an irreversible phase transition from an "on-surface" site by warming to room temperature, without change in the periodicity of the surface unit cell or of the coverage [32][33][34][35][36][37][38]. 3) The alkali metal atom may switch site on variation of coverage [29,31,[40][41][42][43], and 4) island formation may occur [13,31,[44][45][46][47][48]. 5) There may be a strong intermixing of the alkali metal atom with the substrate surface [49][50][51][52], as for example the formation of a four layer ordered surface alloy which had been identified for Na on Al (111) at a coverage Θ Na = 0.5 [51,52].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%