2016
DOI: 10.15837/ijccc.2016.6.2501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coverage Optimization Strategy for WSN based on Energy-aware

Abstract: In order to optimize the wireless sensor network coverage, this paper designs a coverage optimization strategy for wireless sensor network (EACS) based on energy-aware. Under the assumption that the geographic positions of sensor nodes are available, the proposed strategy consists of energy-aware and network coverage adjustment. It is restricted to conditions such as path loss, residual capacity and monitored area and according to awareness ability of sensors, it would adjust the monitored area, repair network… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The future research will be focused on the development of neural network models and other appropriate applications with various optimization approaches [41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50] included in the identification algorithm. The development of fuzzy models for the translation from French to English will require modifications in the structure of the identification algorithms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The future research will be focused on the development of neural network models and other appropriate applications with various optimization approaches [41][42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50] included in the identification algorithm. The development of fuzzy models for the translation from French to English will require modifications in the structure of the identification algorithms.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to verify the performance of this method, protocols such as MREBR (Maximum Residual Energy Based Routing), MEC and SOR were selected to compare with the UCEEC protocol. According to the simulation settings of these comparison protocols [3,4,[10][11][12][13]25] , the network setting is listed in Table 2.…”
Section: Simulation Data and Network Settingmentioning
confidence: 99%