2021
DOI: 10.1002/ana.25995
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Covert Speech Comprehension Predicts Recovery From Acute Unresponsive States

Abstract: Objective Patients with traumatic brain injury who fail to obey commands after sedation‐washout pose one of the most significant challenges for neurological prognostication. Reducing prognostic uncertainty will lead to more appropriate care decisions and ensure provision of limited rehabilitation resources to those most likely to benefit. Bedside markers of covert residual cognition, including speech comprehension, may reduce this uncertainty. Methods We recruited 28 patients with acute traumatic brain injury … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
59
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
4
59
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Another key consideration in future clinical trial design will be the timing of enrollment, particularly for patients with cognitive motor dissociation [ 30 ] (i.e., active command-following on task-based fMRI or EEG) or covert cortical processing [ 10 ] (i.e., passive responses to language or music on stimulus-based fMRI or EEG). Emerging evidence suggests that these two groups of patients have a better chance of long-term functional recovery than do patients without responses on task-based or stimulus-based diagnostic tests [ 26 , 234 ], which may also suggest an increased receptivity to therapeutic stimulation. Investigators will have to consider whether these patients should be analyzed as prespecified subgroups in future studies and whether a transition from unresponsiveness to cognitive motor dissociation or covert cortical processing should be defined as a favorable therapeutic response.…”
Section: Discussion and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another key consideration in future clinical trial design will be the timing of enrollment, particularly for patients with cognitive motor dissociation [ 30 ] (i.e., active command-following on task-based fMRI or EEG) or covert cortical processing [ 10 ] (i.e., passive responses to language or music on stimulus-based fMRI or EEG). Emerging evidence suggests that these two groups of patients have a better chance of long-term functional recovery than do patients without responses on task-based or stimulus-based diagnostic tests [ 26 , 234 ], which may also suggest an increased receptivity to therapeutic stimulation. Investigators will have to consider whether these patients should be analyzed as prespecified subgroups in future studies and whether a transition from unresponsiveness to cognitive motor dissociation or covert cortical processing should be defined as a favorable therapeutic response.…”
Section: Discussion and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Electrophysiological biomarkers can be used to detect CMD [59]. EEG can be used at the bedside to detect command-following [10,40,41,60] and covert cortical processing [44,61] in patients who do not show behavioral evidence of purposeful responses. EEG can also be used to develop biomarkers of cellular preservation that relate to outcomes, such as features within burst suppression patterns, that allow for the identification of patients with and without a chance to recover [62][63][64].…”
Section: Panel Discussion Of the Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Biomarkers of covert consciousness may improve prognostic capabilities for patients with coma [10]. Similarly, biomarkers of covert cortical processing (i.e., association cortex responses to language otherwise missed by behavioral assessments) also may predict long-term functional outcomes [44]. A combination of model-based and datadriven analyses may enhance mechanistic understanding of DoC [37].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another promising approach to investigating consciousness in populations with restricted responsiveness, such as infants and patients with cerebral lesions, is the use of neural frequency tagging, which we initially developed to evaluate language capacities and access to meaning in neurotypical individuals (Ding et al, 2016). Recently, we and others have used the frequency tagging approach for both retrospective (Gui et al, 2020) and prospective (Sokoliuk et al, 2021) classification on unresponsive patients, and the results have been encouraging.…”
Section: Homework For the Field 21 Development Of New Methods For Investigating The Nccmentioning
confidence: 99%