2022
DOI: 10.1080/15564886.2022.2133034
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

COVID-19 and Courts: An Exploration of the Impacts of the Pandemic on Case Processing and Operations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Across federal, state, and local jurisdictions, strategies to reduce the spread of the virus resulted in greater social distancing efforts including either full and/or partial closures to courthouses and probation and parole offices (Cohen & Starr, 2021). In response, most in-person court proceedings including hearings and jury trials were largely eliminated and jails or prisons were reluctant to take clients for supervision violations (Baldwin et al, 2020;Viglione et al, 2023). Around the same time, organizations and criminal justice entities released statements recommending community correction agencies to suspend jail and prison incarceration and reduce their use of technical violations throughout the pandemic (Vera Institute of Justice, 2020).…”
Section: Impact Of Covid-19 On Responses To Violationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Across federal, state, and local jurisdictions, strategies to reduce the spread of the virus resulted in greater social distancing efforts including either full and/or partial closures to courthouses and probation and parole offices (Cohen & Starr, 2021). In response, most in-person court proceedings including hearings and jury trials were largely eliminated and jails or prisons were reluctant to take clients for supervision violations (Baldwin et al, 2020;Viglione et al, 2023). Around the same time, organizations and criminal justice entities released statements recommending community correction agencies to suspend jail and prison incarceration and reduce their use of technical violations throughout the pandemic (Vera Institute of Justice, 2020).…”
Section: Impact Of Covid-19 On Responses To Violationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, research coming out of community corrections during the early phases of the pandemic reported that an inability to hold clients accountable represented one of the biggest challenges that officers faced (Lockwood et al, 2023). with courthouse closures (Viglione et al, 2020), delays/backlogs in case processing in the courts (Viglione et al, 2023), and limited jail and prison space (or refusal to accept violators) (Cohen & Starr, 2021), PPOs were in uncharted territory regarding the availability of options. while existing research documents the challenges PPOs and agencies reported, we know little about how officers did respond to noncompliance when traditional, incarceration-based sanctions were unavailable.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent literature found it was more difficult for POs to assist individuals on their caseload in providing access to resources (e.g., treatment programs and community service), as many outside programs shut down completely or had drastically reduced capacity (Sirdfield et al, 2022). Officers were also unable to formally respond to supervision violations due to shifts in courtroom processes and policing (e.g., court backlogs, delay of probation violation hearings, and not issuing/acting on warrants) (Viglione et al, 2020(Viglione et al, , 2023. with their ability to issue violations and/or revocations limited, POs were left with reduced tools to address and/ or respond to client behavior (Schwalbe & koetzle, 2021;Viglione et al, 2020).…”
Section: Officer-level Changes Due To Covid-19mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the pandemic, in many countries, judicial activities moved from traditional court processes to online modes using technologies. Innovative approaches such as video conference or teleconference were useful in increasing access to justice during global crises (Sourdin, Li, and McNamara, 2020;Viglione, Peck, and Frazier, 2022). A similar approach could be considered in addressing supply issues of legal services in rural areas and creating more accessible justice systems for persons with disabilities.…”
Section: Rural and Urban Divides In Justice Accessmentioning
confidence: 99%