2021
DOI: 10.1111/irfi.12351
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

COVID‐19 and ESG preferences: Corporate bonds versus equities

Abstract: I examine investors' within ESG investment preferences during the COVID-19 pandemic by investigating the return spillover effects across the three different corporate bonds and equities-based investment strategies. Investors prefer making investments in ESG leaders in the investment-grade corporate bond market over ESG leaders in the equity and high yield corporate bond markets during times of uncertainty. It suggests that capital flows away from high yield corporate bond and equity markets to the investment-g… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Naeem et al [40] find similar evidence that during the market stress, such as the COVID-19 market shock, green bonds provide significant diversification benefits and are able to absorb the turbulent of market downfall. This is also consistent with the evidence that during the COVID-19 pandemic, there were investment preferences in ESG leaders in investment grade bonds over ESG leaders in the equity and high-yield bond markets [41].…”
Section: Esg Investing and Its Implications: Fixed-income Marketssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Naeem et al [40] find similar evidence that during the market stress, such as the COVID-19 market shock, green bonds provide significant diversification benefits and are able to absorb the turbulent of market downfall. This is also consistent with the evidence that during the COVID-19 pandemic, there were investment preferences in ESG leaders in investment grade bonds over ESG leaders in the equity and high-yield bond markets [41].…”
Section: Esg Investing and Its Implications: Fixed-income Marketssupporting
confidence: 89%
“…This study mainly uses the ESG rating from 2011 to 2020 from the Sino‐Securities Index Information Service 4 as the explained variable for two main reasons. On the one hand, although several international institutions have conducted ratings based on corporate ESG information disclosure (Tang et al, 2022), such as Refinitiv Asset4 (Arora et al, 2022; Barros et al, 2022; Martins, 2022), MSCI (Lioui & Tarelli, 2022; Singh, 2022), and Bloomberg (Huang et al, 2022; Zhang et al, 2021), they are relatively poorly matched with China's domestic development and market characteristics. In response, China's Sino‐Securities Index Information Service launched ESG ratings in line with the characteristics of the Chinese market, which have been cited in numerous studies (Li, Hu, & Hong, 2022; Li, Zhang, & Zhao, 2022).…”
Section: Methodology and Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies mainly discuss the role of ESG disclosure. For example, ESG disclosure can be used as a basis for investments in uncertain times (Singh, 2022), improve information efficiency, and reduce company-specific risks (He, Qin, et al, 2022). Other studies explore the factors influencing ESG disclosure, including M&A transactions (Barros et al, 2022), natural disasters (Huang et al, 2022), and corporate competition (Martins, 2022).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By using the generalized forecast error variance decompositions (FEVDs), the return spillover effects capture cross-market return shocks in terms of their total contribution (Singh & Singh, 2016;Singh & Kaur, 2017;Singh, 2020;Singh, 2021;Singh, 2022). The generalized version captures percentage of variance to variable i due to innovations to variable j.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%