COVID-19 and Everyday ICT Use: The Discursive Construction of Old Age in German Media

Abstract

Background and Objectives Media discourses have the power to construct and perpetuate positive and negative aging images and influence public and individuals’ attitudes. This study aims to critically examine the media portrayal of older persons’ everyday information and communication technology (EICT) usage during the first and second waves of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Research Design and Methods A total of 51 articles published in 3 leading German newspapers between March 2020 and November 2020 were identified from the LexisNexis Academic database. Data were analyzed employing critical discourse and thematic analysis. Results EICT use was associated with youthful, consumption-orientated, and active lifestyles, while nonuse was constructed as failures on the policy or individual level. The pandemic seemed to have acted as an amplifier, further exacerbating and perpetuating stereotypical, dichotomous, but also empowering aging images. Discussion and Implications Neoliberal rational and binary distinctions of active users and nonusers opened and encouraged critical discussions on positive aging trends, the concept of the third and fourth ages, and aging-and-innovation discourses. Moreover, the crucial educative role of the media in raising awareness about power imbalances and reducing EICT-related ageism is stressed.

Digital Technologies’ (ICTs) Impact on University Students in Pakistan during Covid -19: Exploring the Variables of Social Isolation, Anxiety, Interaction and Addiction

“…The above results are in line with Köttl et al (2021) that asserts that the consumption of ICTs and mobile technologies in the first and 2 nd phase of Covid-19 are extensive and their effects on German audience are varying. However, the influence of ICTs and related technologies are comprehensive in the areas of education but it greatly influence the social behavior of individuals.…”

How Age and Gender Affect the Opinions of Computing Students Regarding Computer Usage and Design Needs

“…What is more, there is also a bias against older people, termed as "ageism", i.e., the assumption that older adults tend to be both incapable of learning how to use new media and technological devices and disinterested in learning how to use them [35][36][37]. Popular media have reported that even organizations focused on older adults have been found to use images of technology-limited older people [38].…”

It’s not enough to be seen: exploring how journalists show aged care in Australia from 2018-2021

“…Indeed, much of the extant research on ageing and aged care discourse tends to focus on verbal discourses at the expense of visual ones (see Lichtenstein, 2021), sometimes for pragmatic reasons (eg, that popular news databases for researchers such as ProQuest and Factiva only provide text and not image results), disciplinary conventions, or the historical and ongoing effects of logocentrism (Lemke, 2002;Bock, 2020). The present study responds to calls by scholars (Köttl, et al, 2021) to analyse other types of media (eg, online media), as well as graphics and pictures. It recognises that 'the type of representation of older people in media is more difficult to examine than the simple amount of representation' (Martin, 2009) and, as such, seeks to go beyond simple frequencies of who is depicted to explore in a more nuanced way how these people are depicted and with what implications.…”

“…News media coverage of older people and aged care Past research has shown that the media rarely depict older people (Torben-Nielsen & Russ-Mohl, 2012;Lauzen & Dozier 2005;Robinson et al 2007;Fealy & McNamara, 2009;Thayer & Skufca, 2020) and, when they are represented, they are often shown through the lenses of dependency, frailty, cognitive decline, and loneliness (Köttl, et al, 2021;Fraser, et al, 2016;Thayer & Skufca, 2020). This stereotypical and negative coverage can influence how older people think of themselves, as well as influencing expectations of broader society and accompanying public policies.…”