2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2021.106236
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

COVID-19 and lending responses of European banks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
22
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
4
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The better resilience against an increase in nonperforming loans would also be explained, partly, with the fact that some smaller banks did not fully report losses associated with COVID-19. Such behaviour of banks confirms the research of Neef and Schandlbauer, who found that, during the crisis, smaller banks and less capitalized banks in Europe extended more new loans, inter alia, to support their weaker borrowers and avoid loan loss recognition and creation of write-offs reducing their equity [51]. The analysis of the banks with stronger and weaker capital standing showed that the over-cap group was the most resilient to the extraordinary increase in credit losses caused by the COVID-19 pandemic and was the best performer of any group analysed so far.…”
Section: Results Of Modelling and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The better resilience against an increase in nonperforming loans would also be explained, partly, with the fact that some smaller banks did not fully report losses associated with COVID-19. Such behaviour of banks confirms the research of Neef and Schandlbauer, who found that, during the crisis, smaller banks and less capitalized banks in Europe extended more new loans, inter alia, to support their weaker borrowers and avoid loan loss recognition and creation of write-offs reducing their equity [51]. The analysis of the banks with stronger and weaker capital standing showed that the over-cap group was the most resilient to the extraordinary increase in credit losses caused by the COVID-19 pandemic and was the best performer of any group analysed so far.…”
Section: Results Of Modelling and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…The dependent variable is the first difference of total deposits divided by lagged total assets (similar to e.g., Acharya and Mora, 2015 , Cornett et al, 2011 , Li et al, 2020 , Dursun-de Neef and Schandlbauer, 2021 ). is our bank-specific weighted average COVID-19 cases per capita measure, lagged by one period, as defined in Eq.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, Colak and Öztekin (2021) study the effect of the pandemic on global lending by analyzing banks from 125 countries and Duan et al (2021) examine changes in banks’ systemic risk for over 1500 listed banks from 64 countries. Focusing on European banks, Dursun-de Neef and Schandlbauer (2021) show that worse-capitalized banks increased their loan supply significantly more during the pandemic while holding their delinquent loans lower than their better-capitalized peers, which is attributed to zombie lending by worse-capitalized banks in an attempt to avoid write-offs on their capital. We contribute to this literature by showing that households accumulated their savings in their deposit accounts as a result of a reduction in their spending — they were not able to spend money on leisure activities due to reduced mobility.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Currently, scholars have concentrated on analyzing the shortterm impact of COVID-19 on the banking sector and have focused their research on banks' lending business, business performance, and business risks [3,13,14]. In addition, we should also focus on the impact that COVID-19 will have on the branches of the banking sector since this impact will change the business model of banks and have a long-term impact on their profitability.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%