COVID-19 and the Gendered Use of Emojis on Twitter: Infodemiology Study

Abstract

Background The online discussion around the COVID-19 pandemic is multifaceted, and it is important to examine the different ways by which online users express themselves. Since emojis are used as effective vehicles to convey ideas and sentiments, they can offer important insight into the public’s gendered discourses about the pandemic. Objective This study aims at exploring how people of different genders (eg, men, women, and sex and gender minorities) are discussed in relation to COVID-19 through the study of Twitter emojis. Methods We collected over 50 million tweets referencing the hashtags #Covid-19 and #Covid19 for a period of more than 2 months in early 2020. Using a mixed method, we extracted three data sets containing tweets that reference men, women, and sexual and gender minorities, and we then analyzed emoji use along each gender category. We identified five major themes in our analysis including morbidity fears, health concerns, employment and financial issues, praise for frontline workers, and unique gendered emoji use. The top 600 emojis were manually classified based on their sentiment, indicating how positive, negative, or neutral each emoji is and studying their use frequencies. Results The findings indicate that the majority of emojis are overwhelmingly positive in nature along the different genders, but sexual and gender minorities, and to a lesser extent women, are discussed more negatively than men. There were also many differences alongside discourses of men, women, and gender minorities when certain topics were discussed, such as death, financial and employment matters, gratitude, and health care, and several unique gendered emojis were used to express specific issues like community support. Conclusions Emoji research can shed light on the gendered impacts of COVID-19, offering researchers an important source of information on health crises as they happen in real time.

COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in Canada: Content Analysis of Tweets Using the Theoretical Domains Framework

“…This study did not require research ethics approval, as it was based on data that were publicly available. Other Canadian-based studies [ 26 ] have forgone ethical review by using publicly available Twitter data, as some sources are anonymous or unidentifiable. Only the Twitter user’s username (ie, handle), city or town, and tweet content were extracted.…”

What social media told us in the time of COVID-19: a scoping review

“…79 Al-Rawi and colleagues studied emojis in over 50 million tweets and identified five primary subjects: morbidity fears, health concerns, employment and financial issues, praise for front-line Review workers, and unique gendered emoji use. 51 Samuel and colleagues investigated 293 597 tweets with sentiment analysis and noted more positive emotions than negative emotions towards the US economy reopening. 86 Analysing 2 558 474 English tweets by use of clustering and network analyses, Odlum and colleagues identified that African Americans shared positive sentiments and encouraged virtual discussions and prevention behaviours.…”

Social media and COVID-19 misinformation: how ignorant Facebook users are?

“…Although it is an important area of misinformation study, the previous researchers did not pay proper attention to social media users' emotional aspects and their interaction with misinformation. Emotional reaction has been considered an important area of psychological research, and social media researchers have recently adopted the idea of users' emotional investigations mostly by analyzing emojis ( Al-Rawi, 2020 ; Al-Rawi et al., 2020 ). To frame the universal emotions, Ekman (1992) , based on human facial expressions, developed his basic emotion theory consisting of six emotions: happiness, sadness, anger, surprise, fear, and disgust.…”