COVID-19 Communication From Seven Health Care Institutions in North Texas for English- and Spanish-Speaking Cancer Patients: Mixed Method Website Study

Abstract

Background The COVID-19 pandemic has created an urgent need to rapidly disseminate health information, especially to those with cancer, because they face higher morbidity and mortality rates. At the same time, the pandemic’s disproportionate impact on Latinx populations underscores the need for information to reach Spanish speakers. However, the equity of COVID-19 information communicated through institutions’ online media to Spanish-speaking cancer patients is unknown. Objective We conducted a multimodal, mixed method document review study to evaluate the equity of online information about COVID-19 and cancer available to English- and Spanish-speaking populations from seven health care institutions in North Texas, where one in five adults is Spanish-speaking. Our focus was less on the “digital divide,” which conveys disparities in access to computers and the internet based on the race/ethnicity, education, and income of at-risk populations; rather, our study asks the following question: to what extent is online content useful and culturally appropriate in meeting Spanish speakers’ information needs? Methods We reviewed 50 websites (33 English and 17 Spanish) over a period of 1 week in the middle of May 2020. We sampled seven institutions’ main oncology and COVID web pages, and both internal (institutional) and external (noninstitutional) linked content. We conducted several analyses for each sampled page, including (1) thematic content analysis, (2) literacy level analysis using Readability Studio software, (3) coding using the Patient Education and Materials Assessment Tool (PEMAT), and (4) descriptive analysis of video and diversity content. Results The themes most frequently addressed on English and Spanish websites differed. While “resources/FAQs” were frequently cited themes on both websites, English websites more frequently addressed “news/updates” and “cancer+COVID,” and Spanish websites addressed “protection” and “COVID data.” Spanish websites had on average a lower literacy level (11th grade) than English websites (13th grade), although still far above the recommended guideline of 6th to 8th grade. The PEMAT’s overall average accessibility score was the same for English (n=33 pages) and Spanish pages (n=17 pages) at 82%. Among the Dallas-Fort Worth organizations, the average accessibility of Spanish pages (n=7) was slightly lower than that of English pages (n=19) (77% vs 81%), due mostly to the discrepancy in English-only videos and visual aids. Of the 50 websites, 12 (24%) had embedded videos; however, 100% of videos were in English, including one on a Spanish website. Conclusions We identified an uneven response among the seven health care institutions for providing equitable information to Spanish-speaking Dallas-Fort Worth residents concerned about COVID and cancer. Spanish speakers lack equal access in both diversity of content about COVID-19 and access to other websites, leaving an already vulnerable cancer patient population at greater risk. We recommend several specific actions to enhance content and navigability for Spanish speakers.

Health literacy characteristics of over-the-counter rapid antigen COVID-19 test materials

“…We did not directly assess consumer understanding instructions and/or demonstration of nasal swab collection and results interpretation. Instead, consistent with previously conducted studies, 23 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 37 we used established health literacy assessment tools (i.e., FRE, F–H, UFT, SAM, PEMAT-A/V) to gauge likelihood of consumer understanding and proper use of OTC rapid antigen COVID-19 tests. Direct assessment of patient/consumer comprehension of instructions—semi-structured interviews and/or focus groups—could potentially pinpoint content areas and formatting characteristics in need of refinement as future OTC COVID-19 test instructions are developed.…”

“…Utilizing methodology described by Higashi and colleagues, we assessed cultural diversity and inclusiveness by recording personal characteristics of individuals presented in each video. 23 Using the established Global Quality Scale (GQS), 24 we assessed overall video quality. GQS scores range from 1 (video is of poor quality, poor flow, lacking most information, and therefore not useful for patients) to 5 (video is of excellent quality, excellent flow, very useful for patients, includes completely accurate information).…”

Analysis of Language Translations of State Governments' Coronavirus Disease 2019 Vaccine Websites

“…Other studies have also documented reduced content, readability, and ease of navigability of the non-English parts of the COVID-19 websites of selected PHDs and private health care systems. 16 , 34 These findings highlight the need for additional studies on the accessibility of translated COVID-19 information, which could inform the development of translation standards and guide the design of more user-friendly websites for non-English speakers.…”

The effectiveness of self-care management in treating heart failure: A scoping review

“…The COVID-19 pandemic has posed major challenges for healthcare organizations to address public information demands. 55 Patients believe there are gaps in information and knowledge on testing and therapy. However, the experiences of other heart failure patients are considered essential in providing support, which is bridged by the website.…”