COVID-19 impact in supply chain performance: a study on the construction industry

Cherian, Tisha Meriam; Arun, C. Joe

doi:10.1108/ijppm-04-2021-0220

Cited by 12 publications

(15 citation statements)

References 63 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…To this end, several knowledge flow methods (Hendriks and Vriens, 1999) have been applied in knowledge acquisition techniques to obtain tacit digital knowledge and expert intelligence systems from domain experts. These techniques are formally functional as they expand the knowledge databases of KMSs and formally document online information (Cherian and Arun, 2022). In addition, multiple knowledge discovery approaches, such as AI-related methods, are effective in identifying interlinkages and trends in knowledge databases to create new digital intelligence (Del Giudice et al, 2020).…”

Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning

confidence: 99%

Digitalization and artificial knowledge for accountability in SCM: a systematic literature review

Vaio

Latif

Gunarathne

et al. 2023

JEIM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

PurposeIn this study, the authors examine artificial knowledge as a fundamental stream of knowledge management for sustainable and resilient business models in supply chain management (SCM). The study aims to provide a comprehensive overview of artificial knowledge and digitalization as key enablers of the improvement of SCM accountability and sustainable performance towards the UN 2030 Agenda.Design/methodology/approachUsing the SCOPUS database and Google Scholar, the authors analyzed 135 English-language publications from 1990 to 2022 to chart the pattern of knowledge production and dissemination in the literature. The data were collected, reviewed and peer-reviewed before conducting bibliometric analysis and a systematic literature review to support future research agenda.FindingsThe results highlight that artificial knowledge and digitalization are linked to the UN 2030 Agenda. The analysis further identifies the main issues in achieving sustainable and resilient SCM business models. Based on the results, the authors develop a conceptual framework for artificial knowledge and digitalization in SCM to increase accountability and sustainable performance, especially in times of sudden crises when business resilience is imperative.Research limitations/implicationsThe study results add to the extant literature by examining artificial knowledge and digitalization from the resilience theory perspective. The authors suggest that different strategic perspectives significantly promote resilience for SCM digitization and sustainable development. Notably, fostering diverse peer exchange relationships can help stimulate peer knowledge and act as a palliative mechanism that builds digital knowledge to strengthen and drive future possibilities.Practical implicationsThis research offers valuable guidance to supply chain practitioners, managers and policymakers in re-thinking, re-formulating and re-shaping organizational processes to meet the UN 2030 Agenda, mainly by introducing artificial knowledge in digital transformation training and education programs. In doing so, firms should focus not simply on digital transformation but also on cultural transformation to enhance SCM accountability and sustainable performance in resilient business models.Originality/valueThis study is, to the authors' best knowledge, among the first to conceptualize artificial knowledge and digitalization issues in SCM. It further integrates resilience theory with institutional theory, legitimacy theory and stakeholder theory as the theoretical foundations of artificial knowledge in SCM, based on firms' responsibility to fulfill the sustainable development goals under the UN's 2030 Agenda.

show abstract

Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning

confidence: 99%

Digitalization and artificial knowledge for accountability in SCM: a systematic literature review

Vaio

Latif

Gunarathne

et al. 2023

JEIM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Four distinct coping strategies were identified, with the most prevalent being construction firms collaborating with one another to share expertise, building materials and personnel in order to successfully complete projects (Salami et al, 2023;Sutterby et al, 2023;Yan & Li, 2022). The second most popular coping strategy was the integration of digital technology such as Building Information Modelling (BIM) and other remote working software to enable building professionals to work collaboratively and seamlessly without having to meet face-to-face (Cherian & Arun, 2022;Shooshtarian et al, 2022;Wang et al, 2022). Construction firms also relied on government support in the form of subsidies and palliatives such as cash assistance for construction workers who were forced to work less hours due to Covid-19 restrictions (Jha, 2021;Oey & Lim, 2021;Raoufi & Fayek, 2021).…”

Section: Themes Investigated By Ppgci Articles During the Covid-19 Er...mentioning

confidence: 99%

Project Performance in the Global Construction Industry during the Covid-19 Era

Chukwu¹,

Zubairu²

2023

EPMJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Covid-19 global pandemic has had profound impact on the way all industries operate now, and the construction industry is no exception. Given the importance of this industry in providing critical infrastructure needed to enhance the quality of life of all global citizens, this paper presented the results of a systematic review of empirical studies that have investigated construction project performance over the Covid-19 era spanning from 2020 to 2023. The Systematic Quantitative Assessment Technique was used to identify and assess 54 empirical articles from six of the most renowned academic publishers in order to answer three important research questions: 1) What was the geographical spread of construction project performance articles from 2020-2023? 2) Which data collection methods were utilized by these articles? 3) What themes were investigated by these articles? The review revealed that Asia had the most representation while South America had no representation at all, thus representing a geographical gap which future studies should address. The review also revealed that most studies relied on surveys to collect project performance data with relatively fewer studies using qualitative methods or adopting a mixed methods approach, with this representing a methodological gap to be addressed by future studies. Finally, the impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on the performance of construction firms was the most investigated theme, while the strategies firms can use to ‘future proof’ themselves against future pandemics or other unexpected disasters was the least investigated theme.

show abstract

“…Magableh (2021) highlights the interconnection between each stage, stating "SC decision-makers and managers must consider the disruptions, consequences and JFMPC 29,1 solutions of each stage carefully", suggesting organisations should first focus on short-term solutions and management to recover and enable the continuity of flows. Cherian and Arun (2022) indicate that during the period of uncertainty, the companies were unprepared to meet the risk, were unable to reinstate the material flow and took a long time to restore it to its original state. Osunsanmi (2022) argues that the disruption caused by Covid-19 caused weak CSC resilience because the existing management model only focuses on preparedness and recovery, not resilience.…”

Section: Supply Chain Disruption Factorsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Cherian and Arun (2022) indicate that during the period of uncertainty, the companies were unprepared to meet the risk, were unable to reinstate the material flow and took a long time to restore it to its original state. Osunsanmi (2022) argues that the disruption caused by Covid-19 caused weak CSC resilience because the existing management model only focuses on preparedness and recovery, not resilience.…”

Section: Literature Reviewmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A critical pandemic impact in key areas of the construction industry shows a reduction in construction productivity, foreign investment, demand for construction-related works, disruption in the supply chain and the number of public projects (King et al , 2022). Cherian and Arun (2022) postulate that the effect of COVID-19 is more on medium-sized builders and developers and found a positive impact between supply chain (SC) agility, resilience and information technology (IT) capabilities on supply chain performance. Osunsanmi et al (2022) suggest a system to optimise CSC management because of SC’s weak resilience during Covid 19 through an evidence-based management approach that is less dependent on implicit knowledge.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The disruptive factors and longevity effects of Covid-19 and Brexit on the SMEs construction supply chain in the UK

Oyegoke

Fisher

Ajayi

et al. 2023

JFMPC

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose Supply chain disruptions have a significant impact on overall project delivery. This study aims to identify the supply chain disruptive factors and develop a framework to mitigate the disruptive effects on the supply chain. Covid-19 and Brexit disruption and their longevity effects in the short, medium and long term on the supply chain are relied upon to develop the framework. Design/methodology/approach The study adopted a mixed-method approach with a sequential explanatory design. The main disruptive factors were identified through a literature review, and key factors were selected through a focus group exercise. A questionnaire survey was carried out to sample opinions from the practitioners; 41 questionnaires were received and analysed using the relative importance index (RII) method for ranking the factors and percentage frequency distribution to determine the longevity effects. Five follow-up semi-structured interviews were conducted over the telephone and later transcribed. Findings The results of Covid-19 disruption indicate that material cost increase ranked first (RII: 0.863), logistics cost increase and supply chain interaction ranked second and third, respectively. They have long-term, medium-term and short-term longevity effects, respectively. The lowest-rated factors were communication (RII: 0.561), staff shortages (RII: 0.629) and impact on relationships (RII: 0.639). The three most ranked Brexit disruptive factors are supply chain interaction (RII: 0.775), material cost increase (RII: 0.766) and logistic and haulage delay (RII: 0.717). The first two factors have long-term effects, and the logistics and haulage delays have a medium-term impact. The mitigating solutions suggested in the framework are collaborative working, stronger resilience to external forces and better transparency and communication that will lead to good relationships among the supply chain members. Research limitations/implications The scope of the study was limited to the UK construction industry; however, the pandemic effect on supply chain can serve as critical learning curve in other developed and developing countries. Practical implications The study will help the government and construction firms to understand the focal areas of importance in solving the supply chain disruption problems based on the effects of Brexit and Covid-19. The research would be useful in ensuring the proactive involvement of the government and contracting firms in their preparedness for similar events in the future. The results could be interpreted for critical learning in other developed/developing countries. Originality/value Identifying and ranking the supply chain disruptive factors affecting the small‐ and medium‐sized enterprises (SMEs) in the UK construction industry has been the focal point of this study. The study also proposes a simple but effective framework comprising the highly ranked factors, their longevity effects and mitigating measures. This will help the SMEs manage future/similar external events affecting the supply chain.

show abstract

COVID-19 impact in supply chain performance: a study on the construction industry

Cited by 12 publications

References 63 publications

Digitalization and artificial knowledge for accountability in SCM: a systematic literature review

Digitalization and artificial knowledge for accountability in SCM: a systematic literature review

Project Performance in the Global Construction Industry during the Covid-19 Era

The disruptive factors and longevity effects of Covid-19 and Brexit on the SMEs construction supply chain in the UK

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About