COVID-19 impact on city and region: what’s next after lockdown?

Abstract

COVID-19 is unique in that it is spread through everyday contact with other people. Therefore, social protective measures, beyond medical protective measures, such as social distancing, lockdowns, border closures, and human tracing are initiated to control the spread of COVID-19. Such responses have produced secondary issues such as drastic changes in people's way of life and work, housing instability, economic shock, and privacy issues. This paper examines the four domains of urban and regional issues related to the secondary impact of COVID-19, including (1) social distancing, urban structure, community, and density; (2) housing affordability; (3) lockdowns, border closures, reshoring, and regional economic recovery; and (4) smart city technology, contact tracing, and privacy. The following six recommendations have been proposed. First, institutional and cultural factors are more important than urban features, such as population density. To handle infectious diseases such as COVID-19, it is important to build systems, technology, infrastructure, and urban structures that can strengthen resilience instead of implementing a directionless policy of dispersion. Second, it is necessary to improve accessibility to essential services at the community level, including medical facilities and food supply. Third, continuous effort should be made to boost housing affordability, as it is directly related to people's basic life. Fourth, measures are needed to protect those people who are socioeconomically disadvantaged. There is also the need to restore global trade and economic relations. Fifth, since data technology-based COVID-19 control raises the human tracing and privacy issue, we must ensure the principles of privacy management, such as transparency and voluntary consent, are being met. Finally, since COVID-19 is spread through people, individuals may become anxious and fearful of others without grounds; this may increase prejudice and hatred, including xenophobia. Significant social effort is needed to overcome such ill-defined anxiety and fear and maintain a healthy civil society.

RETRACTED ARTICLE: The COVID-19 pandemic and its impact on environment: the case of the major cities in Pakistan

“…Abou El-Magd and Zanaty ( 2020 ) used multi-data sensors and found that short-term lockdown had a significant impact on air quality and observed great reduction of carbon emissions from transportation, industrial, and human activities in Egypt. Another study was conducted by Kang et al ( 2020 ) in which the researcher studied secondary impact of COVID-19 on people’s way of life and work, housing instability, economic shock, and privacy in urban regions.…”

Satisfaction with remote teaching during the first semester of the COVID-19 crisis: Psychometric properties of a scale for health students

“…In the health professionals’ training, we know the restrictions that this has mean for teaching, but still know little of its effects, although there already are studies about this aspect in several countries of Europe [ 5 , 13 , 23 , 45 , 46 ], North America [ 24 ] and Asia [ 14 , 18 , 21 , 47 ], there are no evidences in this respect in Latin-America. Nor is there psychometric evidence backing up the instruments that have been employed up to date, or their suitability for an atypical formation context, such as the Emergency Remote Teaching [ 11 ].…”

How Might the COVID-19 Pandemic Affect 21st Century Urban Design, Planning, and Development?

“…From a comparative perspective, South Korea appeared to adapt to the pandemic, while Italy and the United States struggled to address the spread. Kang et al [19] note South Korea's experience with previous viral outbreaks and their resilience planning by having pandemic plans, Though it is far too early to tell just how significant these trends may be, the potential impact of large-scale commercial dispersion on urban centers could be considerable. Millions of businesses rely on the daily patronage of office workers, as well as residents and tourists drawn to the urban core to access employment and entertainment opportunities.…”

“…From a comparative perspective, South Korea appeared to adapt to the pandemic, while Italy and the United States struggled to address the spread. Kang et al [19] note South Korea's experience with previous viral outbreaks and their resilience planning by having pandemic plans, health facilities, personal protective gear (PPE) stockpiles, and smart technology for contact tracing. Additionally, they argue that South Korea's community health centers played an integral role in COVID-19 screening and mitigation.…”