COVID-19 in-hospital mortality and mode of death in a dynamic and non-restricted tertiary care model in Germany

Abstract

Background Reported mortality of hospitalised Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19) patients varies substantially, particularly in critically ill patients. So far COVID-19 in-hospital mortality and modes of death under state of the art care have not been systematically studied. Methods This retrospective observational monocenter cohort study was performed after implementation of a non-restricted, dynamic tertiary care model at the University Medical Center Freiburg, an experienced acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and extracorporeal membrane-oxygenation (ECMO) referral center. All hospitalised patients with PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection were included. The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality, secondary endpoints included major complications and modes of death. A multistate analysis and a Cox regression analysis for competing risk models were performed. Modes of death were determined by two independent reviewers. Results Between February 25, and May 8, 213 patients were included in the analysis. The median age was 65 years, 129 patients (61%) were male. 70 patients (33%) were admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU), of which 57 patients (81%) received mechanical ventilation and 23 patients (33%) ECMO support. Using multistate methodology, the estimated probability to die within 90 days after COVID-19 onset was 24% in the whole cohort. If the levels of care at time of study entry were accounted for, the probabilities to die were 16% if the patient was initially on a regular ward, 47% if in the intensive care unit (ICU) and 57% if mechanical ventilation was required at study entry. Age ≥65 years and male sex were predictors for in-hospital death. Predominant complications–as judged by two independent reviewers–determining modes of death were multi-organ failure, septic shock and thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications. Conclusion In a dynamic care model COVID-19-related in-hospital mortality remained very high. In the absence of potent antiviral agents, strategies to alleviate or prevent the identified complications should be investigated. In this context, multistate analyses enable comparison of models-of-care and treatment strategies and allow estimation and allocation of health care resources.

In-hospital mortality from severe COVID-19 in a tertiary care center in Mexico City; causes of death, risk factors and the impact of hospital saturation

“…In this study, prevalence of diabetes was nearly twice the known national prevalence (13.7% according to the 2016 National Health and Nutrition Survey [ 41 ]), but prevalence of hypertension, overweight and obesity were similar (31.5%, 39.1% and 36.1%, respectively [ 36 – 39 ]). Living with diabetes increased 1.5-fold the risk of dying whereas hypertension was not associated with increased mortality.…”

Intra-Household and Close-Contact SARS-CoV-2 Transmission Among Children – a Systematic Review

“…The attack rate defined as individuals with positive RT-PCR of all tested individuals was 13.2% for the students and 16.6% for members of staff. COVID-19 rates were higher in junior grades (7)(8)(9) than in high grades (10)(11)(12).…”

“…COVID-19 is reported to have a mild course in about 80%, and a severe to critical course in about 20% of infected adults. It predominantly causes fever, cough, and severe pneumonia including acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), but other manifestations with predominantly gastrointestinal or neurologic symptoms have been reported (8)(9)(10)(11)(12).…”

Intensive Care Resources and 60-Day Survival of Critically-Ill COVID-19 Patients

“…To characterize the non-survivor and possible determinants of mortality at 60 days, we analyzed the mode of death. Data on mode of death for in-hospital mortality were presented beforehand [5]. Thus, respiratory failure remained eminent in three cases.…”

“…The overall case fatality rates vary internationally (1-12%). Recently, reported case fatality rates in Germany remain lower than in neighboring countries [3][4][5].…”