“…Among the 87 records that were identified through electronic search after duplicates removal, both reviewers independently evaluated the titles and abstracts, removed 68 studies that did not meet the inclusion criteria, and selected 19 potentially relevant reports that were identified and retrieved for detailed evaluation. Among these, 18 papers [6] , [7] , [8] , [9] , [10] , [11] , [12] , [13] , [14] , [15] , [16] , [17] , [18] , [19] , [20] , [21] , [22] , [23] were included in the qualitative synthesis ( Fig. 1 ).…”