COVID-19 legislation in Belgium at the crossroads of a political and a health crisis

Abstract

This paper discusses the corona virus crisis legislation in Belgium, against the background of a political crisis. It raises the questions how a minority government could find legitimacy to take drastic measures that impact upon fundamental rights and how the political crisis impacted the position of Parliament. This is examined from the viewpoint of input, throughput and output legitimacy, and with a comparison to the position of Parliament in Belgium during earlier crises and in the federated entities. The conclusions point to the increased importance of expert advice, an over-use of ministerial police powers, but also to a more important role for Parliament than what we could have expected under the reign of a majority government. While the political crisis did not hinder firm intervention in an initial phase, it is, however, problematic to deal with the effects of the crisis over the longer term.

In trust we trust: The impact of trust in government on excess mortality during the COVID-19 pandemic

“…A central component of such research agenda is the intense debate over the stringency of containment measures such as lockdowns, quarantine rules, suspension of educational activities and public assembly. Public reactions to lockdowns and other policy measures have varied across different countries, ranging from instances where decisive government action enhanced approval ratings to others where similar actions were viewed as setbacks to civil liberties or the economy (e.g., Bekker et al, 2020 ; Popelier, 2020 ). The latter reaction became more salient as the outbreak gradually became less visible to the public.…”

The pandemic: A breeding ground for authoritarian power grabs

“…In liberal democratic countries, the COVID-19 pandemic abruptly reinforced and highlighted the aforementioned trends of democratic decline, particularly in the context of states of emergency and the unfolding of a "surveillance capitalism" (Ziblatt & Levitsky 2019). This process -in many "new", but also "old" and "established" democracies -has been noted in several scientific studies (Guasti 2020;Jean 2020;Merkel 2020;Popelier 2020), even in reports given by UN Secretary General (Guterres 2020), or written by High Representatives of the European Union (Borell 2020). Nevertheless, according to the Economist Intelligence Unit report, 8 by 2020 authoritarianism will be on the rise in 63 of the 82 countries designated as having a democratic regime -whether it is an "imperfect" or "full" democracy.…”

Legislatures in the Time of Covid-19

“…In 'COVID-19 legislation in Belgium at the crossroads of a political and a health crisis', 8 Patricia Popelier analyses the legislative performance in Belgium. Like the Israeli case explored by Bar-Siman-Tov, Belgium is an example of a country in which the coronavirus crisis occurred against the background of a political crisis.…”