2020
DOI: 10.1017/s0033291720001671
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

COVID-19 psychological impact in 3109 healthcare workers in Spain: The PSIMCOV group

Abstract: Background The current coronavirus disease (COVID-19) has a great impact worldwide. Healthcare workers play an essential role and are one of the most exposed groups. Information about the psychosocial impact on healthcare workers is limited. Methods 3109 healthcare workers completed a national, internet-based, cross-sectional 45-item survey between 9 and 19 April 2020. The objective is to assess the psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in Spanish healthcare workers. A Psychologi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

13
117
3
15

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 125 publications
(148 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
13
117
3
15
Order By: Relevance
“…One analysis of all cases in Italy estimated slightly higher mortality due to COVID-19 in physicians and dentists (0.046%) than in the general population (0.039%), due to increased infection incidence (20). Eight new studies were consistent with previous findings that HCWs in areas affected by COVID-19 report high levels of depression, anxiety, and psychological distress (Supplement Table 2) (4, 9, 10, 16,26,34,36,38). Like prior studies, the new studies used a cross-sectional design, did not control for baseline symptoms, did not have a non-HCW control group, and did not control for work exposures.…”
supporting
confidence: 78%
“…One analysis of all cases in Italy estimated slightly higher mortality due to COVID-19 in physicians and dentists (0.046%) than in the general population (0.039%), due to increased infection incidence (20). Eight new studies were consistent with previous findings that HCWs in areas affected by COVID-19 report high levels of depression, anxiety, and psychological distress (Supplement Table 2) (4, 9, 10, 16,26,34,36,38). Like prior studies, the new studies used a cross-sectional design, did not control for baseline symptoms, did not have a non-HCW control group, and did not control for work exposures.…”
supporting
confidence: 78%
“…(2018) ( Park et al., 2018 ) South Korea Cross-sectional MERS 187 nurses 1 month, 2015 SF-36, PSS-10, DRS-15 and the newly developed STIGMA scale to assess the perceived stigma of nurses Pouralizadeh et al. (2020) ( Pouralizadeh et al., 2020 ) Iran Cross-sectional COVID-19 441 nurses 6 days, April 2020 GAD-7 and PHQ-9 Romero et al. (2020) ( Romero et al., 2020 ) Spain Cross-sectional COVID-19 3,109 health care workers 10 days, April 2020 A Psychological Stress and Adaptation at Work Score (PSAS) based on the: Healthcare Stressful Test, Coping Strategies Inventory, Font-Roja Questionnaire and the Trait Meta-Mood Scale Rossi et al.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies conducted in other European countries, and especially in Spain, have highlighted a high risk of health and emergency workers developing symptoms of secondary trauma. In particular, a cross-sectional study on healthcare workers in Spain, which also included ambulance personnel [106], shows a significative psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on their psychological wellbeing and states that the stress level perceived is predominant in workers that are in direct contact with COVID-19 patients. Spanish emergency workers showed a higher level of stress, along with tertiary hospital workers, when compared to other groups, and seniority resulted as a protective factor.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%