2023
DOI: 10.21203/rs.3.rs-3596390/v1
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

COVID-19 Reinfection in Healthcare Workers: An Original Comprehensive Longitudinal Study

Yeganeh Karimi,
Arash Abdollahi,
Seyyed Amir Yasin Ahmadi
et al.

Abstract: Background The ongoing evolution of SARS-CoV-2 has perpetuated the global prevalence of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and the emergence of new cases. Healthcare workers (HCWs), given their heightened exposure to infected individuals, remain particularly susceptible to COVID-19 recurrence. The primary objective of this investigation was to explore the occupational risk factors contributing to COVID-19 recurrence among HCWs. Methods This longitudinal study was carried out in a specialized teaching hospit… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
1

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Reinfections were more common in HCWs from high-risk departments. Our study detected a higher rate of reinfections in HCWs than other studies as the current study comprised a much longer time period and implied multiple variants of Omicron [ 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 ]. Also, in the studies performed during Omicron circulation the populations received multiple vaccine doses after the primary schedule [ 25 , 26 , 30 , 31 ].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 45%
“…Reinfections were more common in HCWs from high-risk departments. Our study detected a higher rate of reinfections in HCWs than other studies as the current study comprised a much longer time period and implied multiple variants of Omicron [ 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 ]. Also, in the studies performed during Omicron circulation the populations received multiple vaccine doses after the primary schedule [ 25 , 26 , 30 , 31 ].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 45%