“…Thirteen studies (25%) used an exclusively qualitative approach that mainly relied on data derived from (a) in-depth, one-to-one online interviews based on semi-structured questionnaires (nine studies), (b) focus group discussions [132], (c) collaborative autoethnographic practices [125], and (d) open-ended survey questions [131,136], which were further subjected to thematic analysis to reveal teachers' overlapping concerns over their sense of well-being and experiences during the pandemic. Again, the cross-sectional research design dominated in this group of studies to the exception of Kim et al's [135] longitudinal qualitative study, while the sample sizes, often selected based on non-probability techniques, e.g., [119,129,136], ranged between 103 and 3 participants reflecting the small-scale nature of these studies. The measurement of TWB was operationalized in only three instances based on Ryff's (2008) model [123], the job-resource model of well-being [129], and ecological systems theory [131], while in most other cases, it was investigated in an exploratory fashion using interview protocols aimed to illustrate the pandemic-induced complexity in teachers' life experiences and the detrimental effect on their well-being, professional growth, and development.…”