COVID-19 Vaccination: What Do We Expect for the Future? A Systematic Literature Review of Social Science Publications in the First Year of the Pandemic (2020–2021)

Abstract

The Covid-19 pandemic has had wide-reaching societal and economic effects and a return to “normal” will take years to accomplish. In light of this situation, the most important advancement since COVID-19′s emergence has been the development of multiple, life-saving, vaccines. Academic research on vaccine has been extensive. It is estimated that in only one year it has been produced more published and indexed papers on this single issue than in the last twenty years on any other single issue, thus, necessitating some organization. This research consists of a systematic literature review of the social science publication on COVID-19 published in the first year of the pandemic (February 2020 to March 2021). This review is important because it occurs at a time when vaccines have begun their global distribution and the best efforts to address the pandemic is through vaccination programs. In this research, 53 papers published in relevant journals are analyzed out of the almost 30,000 articles retrieved from Scopus database. The analysis conducted relies on two different types: descriptive analysis (evolution at the time of citations; evolution over time of keywords; bibliographical mapping of countries, the top 10 most influential papers), and bibliometric analysis for content evaluation. A cluster analysis was performed for the latter. Clustering the research papers, based on the actual content of papers, found there to be five research areas: (1) economic aspects; (2) ethics and legal aspects; (3) health communication; (4) policies and crisis management, and (5) political issues. Yet, this article’s results paint a picture of literature that has not yet considered the full scope of COVID-19’s effect on the economic, political, and population level health and well-being. Nor has it considered these effects across the global community, suggesting new potential areas of research and giving a perspective of what we should expect for the future.

Understanding affirmative action leadership in the South African financial context

“…The research method employed was qualitative content analysis (Fanelli et al, 2020;Pratici and Singer, 2021). Qualitative content analysis is defined as a research technique that allows for the subjective interpretation of the content of data through the logical categorisation procedure of coding and classifying themes or patterns (Shava et al, 2021).…”

Exploring global unionism to inform South African ICT sector union strategy

“…In the final analysis of this study, only 60-70 articles were analysed purposively, from which relevant findings were drawn out. The intensive, systematic literature review, document analysis and synthesis were the most appropriate method for this study because they explored the unionism strategy effectiveness using existing accredited, documented, and published evidence (Pratici and Singer, 2021).…”

A systematic review of construction safety research: quantitative and qualitative content analysis approach

“…It has over 77 million article records, 56 million abstracts, 23,452 peer-reviewed journals (including 5,500 full open access journals), 294 trade publications, 852 book series and 210,000 books in the database (Elsevier, 2020). Based on the Scopus content coverage, recent systematic reviews in different research domains such as medicine (Yuan et al , 2021), environmental science (Goel et al , 2021), social science (Pratici and Singer, 2021), cyber security (Bayramova et al , 2021), technological advancements (Adekunle et al , 2021) and lifestyle and health (Kim and Park, 2021) have considered it as a sole search engine. Similarly, different safety management studies (Asadzadeh et al , 2020; Gao et al , 2019; Jin et al , 2019; Zhou et al , 2015) have used it as a sole or one of the database search engines for conducting a review.…”