2022
DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10091373
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

COVID-19 Vaccine Hesitancy in Australian Patients with Solid Organ Cancers

Abstract: Background: Vaccination is the cornerstone of the global public health response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Excess morbidity and mortality of COVID-19 infection is seen in people with cancer. COVID-19 vaccine hesitancy has been observed in this medically vulnerable population, although associated attitudes and beliefs remain poorly understood. Methods: An online cross-sectional survey of people with solid organ cancers was conducted through nine health services across Australia. Demographics, cancer-related char… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
3
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
1
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results showed that 71.7% of participants had received the COVID-19 vaccine, which was significantly higher when compared to the vaccination rate of 48% in the general population in Serbia at the same time [ 10 ]. In contrast to our findings, a study by Bain et al did not show a significant difference in the vaccination rate between oncology patients and the general population in Australia, although the overall vaccination rate in that country was higher [ 11 ]. However, another study conducted in one of the largest oncology centers in Serbia in 2021, which included patients with both solid and hematological malignancies, reported the highest vaccination rate in patients with genitourinary tumors [ 12 ].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our results showed that 71.7% of participants had received the COVID-19 vaccine, which was significantly higher when compared to the vaccination rate of 48% in the general population in Serbia at the same time [ 10 ]. In contrast to our findings, a study by Bain et al did not show a significant difference in the vaccination rate between oncology patients and the general population in Australia, although the overall vaccination rate in that country was higher [ 11 ]. However, another study conducted in one of the largest oncology centers in Serbia in 2021, which included patients with both solid and hematological malignancies, reported the highest vaccination rate in patients with genitourinary tumors [ 12 ].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, when analyzing the sociodemographic characteristics of our patients, we found that the vaccinated group was significantly older than the unvaccinated group of patients. Our results are consistent with previously published studies that have shown a higher vaccination rate among older people, including oncology patients [ 11 ] and other populations [ 13 ]. This finding is not surprising when knowing that the older population was considered at high risk for severe outcomes of COVID-19 infection, making immunization for this population essential [ 3 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…In our survey, older age increased the likelihood of having an adequate vaccination status (≥ 3 doses) against COVID-19. Likewise, older age has been repeatedly associated with a higher likelihood of vaccine acceptance among patients with cancer in other studies [12,14,15,[23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32]. Interestingly, a single-center study in France evaluating acceptance rate of COVID-19 vaccination and vaccine safety among older patients with cancer (≥ 70 years) conducted in January 2021 found a vaccine acceptance rate of 82.6% and an adequate vaccination rate (2 doses) reached 75.3% [33].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The study by Bongomin et al . focused on high-risk populations, including older adults and multimorbid individuals, with documented vaccine hesitancy, albeit generally low compared to the general population [ 56 58 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%