2021
DOI: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16987.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CovidLife: a resource to understand mental health, well-being and behaviour during the COVID-19 pandemic in the UK

Abstract: CovidLife is a longitudinal observational study designed to investigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health, well-being and behaviour in adults living in the UK. In total, 18,518 participants (mean age = 56.43, SD = 14.35) completed the first CovidLife questionnaire (CovidLife1) between April and June 2020. To date, participants have completed two follow-up assessments. CovidLife2 took place between July and August 2020 (n = 11,319), and CovidLife3 took place in February 2021 (n = 10,386). A r… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

6
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Four of the studies are birth cohorts, containing participants of a similar age (age-homogeneous): National Child Development Study (NCDS; born 1958) (16,17), British Cohort Study (BCS70; born 1970) (17,18), Next Steps (NS; born 1989-90) (17,19) and Millennium Cohort Study (MCS; born 2000-02) (17,20). The remaining five studies covered a wider range of ages (age-heterogeneous): Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) 1 (21,22), TwinsUK (23,24), Born in Bradford (BiB) (25,26), Understanding Society (USoc) (27,28) and Generation Scotland (GS) (29,30). Full details of the studies are provided in Table S1 (Supplementary Material), with ethics and data access statements in Table S2 (Supplementary Material).…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Four of the studies are birth cohorts, containing participants of a similar age (age-homogeneous): National Child Development Study (NCDS; born 1958) (16,17), British Cohort Study (BCS70; born 1970) (17,18), Next Steps (NS; born 1989-90) (17,19) and Millennium Cohort Study (MCS; born 2000-02) (17,20). The remaining five studies covered a wider range of ages (age-heterogeneous): Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (ALSPAC) 1 (21,22), TwinsUK (23,24), Born in Bradford (BiB) (25,26), Understanding Society (USoc) (27,28) and Generation Scotland (GS) (29,30). Full details of the studies are provided in Table S1 (Supplementary Material), with ethics and data access statements in Table S2 (Supplementary Material).…”
Section: Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The subset of the Generation Scotland cohort with reported COVID-19 infection (clinically-diagnosed or positive test from linked test data), who had also participated in the CovidLife study [33] were used for prediction of ongoing symptomatic COVID-19 and hospitalisation from COVID-19 (n=713). Ongoing symptomatic COVID-19 cases were defined here as individuals with self-reported symptoms lasting ≥ 4 weeks [34].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Self-reported COVID-19 phenotypes were available in a subset of individuals from the Generation Scotland DNA methylation sample who had also participated in the CovidLife surveys (n=2,399) [33]. Ongoing symptomatic COVID-19 phenotypes were ascertained from CovidLife survey 3, (n=1,802 Generation Scotland participants with DNAm profiled), where participants were asked about the total overall time they experienced symptoms in their first/only episode of illness, as well as the whole of their COVID-19 illness.…”
Section: Supplementary Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, longitudinal population studies such as Generation Scotland are particularly well-positioned to study the COVID-19 pandemic 3 . This led to the formulation of the CovidLife project, studying the impact of COVID-19 on over 18,000 adults in the UK 4 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%