2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-021-24078-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

COVseq is a cost-effective workflow for mass-scale SARS-CoV-2 genomic surveillance

Abstract: While mass-scale vaccination campaigns are ongoing worldwide, genomic surveillance of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is critical to monitor the emergence and global spread of viral variants of concern (VOC). Here, we present a streamlined workflow—COVseq—which can be used to generate highly multiplexed sequencing libraries compatible with Illumina platforms from hundreds of SARS-CoV-2 samples in parallel, in a rapid and cost-effective manner. We benchmark COVseq against a standard… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To date, several groups have developed different protocols and workflows for SARS-CoV-2 WGS by NGS. However, most of the published studies are small in study sample size, low in throughput or may require complex enzymatic steps 11,12,[25][26][27][28][29] . In one study, the commercially available COVIDSeq test (Illumina) was scaled up to sequence 752 clinical samples in duplicate for a total of 1536 samples and controls on a NovaSeq 6000 instrument using an S4 flow cell 30 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To date, several groups have developed different protocols and workflows for SARS-CoV-2 WGS by NGS. However, most of the published studies are small in study sample size, low in throughput or may require complex enzymatic steps 11,12,[25][26][27][28][29] . In one study, the commercially available COVIDSeq test (Illumina) was scaled up to sequence 752 clinical samples in duplicate for a total of 1536 samples and controls on a NovaSeq 6000 instrument using an S4 flow cell 30 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…org/).The initial SARS-CoV-2 genome sequence was obtained through a metagenomic approach and confirmed by Sanger sequencing and PCR 2,9,10 . As the pandemic progressed, multiple NGS approaches have been utilized for SARS-CoV-2 sequencing, including shotgun metagenomics, hybrid capture enrichment, and amplicon-based sequencing [11][12][13][14] . Shotgun sequencing requires no prior knowledge of the targeted viral genome 15 but is limited by requirements for a high viral load and a higher sequencing depth.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 25× coverage cutoff for VPipe reference recruitment is intermediate between less stringent 10× ( 38 ) and more stringent 75× ( 39 ) cutoffs employed in other SARS-CoV-2 analysis pipelines. Since accurate identification of SNPs is important for classifying SARS-CoV-2 variants and accurate phylogenies ( 38 40 ), the >98% SNP concordance between VPipe (25× filter consensus) and Genome Detective supports the results generated by the VPipe reference recruitment module.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Viral whole-genome sequencing has been the primary mechanism to identify variant spread and novel mutations and lineages. While viral whole-genome sequencing is a comprehensive approach for variant detection, it can be both cost-and time-prohibitive for institutions outside of genome centers and reference laboratories [13]. To address this issue, several groups have attempted to develop PCR-(polymerase chain reaction) based methods for clade or variant determination using either allele-specific probes, small amplicon high-resolution melting, fluorescence resonance energy transfer polymerase chain reaction, or CRISPR [14][15][16][17][18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%