2001
DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2001.tb143099.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

COX‐2 inhibition and thrombotic tendency: a need for surveillance

Abstract: Cyclooxygenase‐2 (COX‐2) inhibitors belong to a new class of drugs which have anti‐inflammatory efficacy similar to that of traditional non‐steroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), but are associated with a reduced incidence of adverse upper gastrointestinal events. Biochemical evidence that COX‐2 inhibitors could promote or exacerbate a tendency to thrombosis is supported by recent results from clinical trials and case reports. Two agents in this class, celecoxib and rofecoxib, have been listed on the Pharm… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The analysis, however, does not take into consideration other benefits, such as the reduction in non‐serious GI adverse events, the number of lives (or ‘life‐years’) saved and increases in economic productivity, and less tangible benefits, such as improvement in quality of life, were not evaluated. In addition, the potential costs resulting from possible increases in cardiovascular and renal morbidity associated with COX‐2 inhibitor use were not considered 18,19 . Clearly, further work is required in this area to evaluate fully the costs and benefits of selective COX‐2 inhibitors, but the results of the present study indicate that a significant increase in health expenditure is likely if the putative benefits of this new class of drugs are to be gained.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The analysis, however, does not take into consideration other benefits, such as the reduction in non‐serious GI adverse events, the number of lives (or ‘life‐years’) saved and increases in economic productivity, and less tangible benefits, such as improvement in quality of life, were not evaluated. In addition, the potential costs resulting from possible increases in cardiovascular and renal morbidity associated with COX‐2 inhibitor use were not considered 18,19 . Clearly, further work is required in this area to evaluate fully the costs and benefits of selective COX‐2 inhibitors, but the results of the present study indicate that a significant increase in health expenditure is likely if the putative benefits of this new class of drugs are to be gained.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the potential costs resulting from possible increases in cardiovascular and renal morbidity associated with COX-2 inhibitor use were not considered. 18,19 Clearly, further work is required in this area to evaluate fully the costs and benefits of selective COX-2 inhibitors, but the results of the present study indicate that a significant increase in health expenditure is likely if the putative benefits of this new class of drugs are to be gained.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 91%
“…Nevertheless it is useful to consider that when Australian population figures from the 1990s are used, there would need to be an increase of only 0.34% to 0.68% in the annual death rate from ischaemic heart disease to balance the deaths per annum from NSAID induced upper gastrointestinal events. 18 …”
Section: Duty Of Care In Therapeutic Practicementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both COX-1 and COX-2 are involved in the product ion of prostaglandins and thromboxa nes (Cleland et al 2001).…”
Section: Tolerability: Cardiovascular Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%