2015
DOI: 10.1007/s00605-015-0848-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Coxeter groups as Beauville groups

Abstract: Abstract. We generalize earlier work of Fuertes and González-Diez as well as earlier work of Bauer, Catanese and Grunewald by classifying which of the irreducible Coxeter groups are (strongly real) Beauville groups. We also make partial progress on the much more difficult question of which Coxeter groups are Beauville groups in general as well as discussing the related question of which Coxeter groups can be used in the construction of mixed Beauville groups.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

2
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Another class of 2-generated finite groups that have only been partially investigated from the viewpoint of Beauville constructions are reflection groups. In [31] the author proves the following. Altogether the above goes most of the way to classifying which of the real reflection groups are strongly real Beauville groups, however completing the task is more difficult.…”
Section: Reflection Groupsmentioning
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Another class of 2-generated finite groups that have only been partially investigated from the viewpoint of Beauville constructions are reflection groups. In [31] the author proves the following. Altogether the above goes most of the way to classifying which of the real reflection groups are strongly real Beauville groups, however completing the task is more difficult.…”
Section: Reflection Groupsmentioning
confidence: 82%
“…Altogether the above goes most of the way to classifying which of the real reflection groups are strongly real Beauville groups, however completing the task is more difficult. Several examples are given in [31,Section 5] showing that K 1 × K 2 can be a strongly real Beauville group, even when K 1 and/or K 2 are not. Question 8.…”
Section: Reflection Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%