2023
DOI: 10.1039/d2dt03611h
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cp* non-innocence and the implications of (η4-Cp*H)Rh intermediates in the hydrogenation of CO2, NAD+, amino-borane, and the Cp* framework – a computational study

Abstract: In hydrogenation mediated by half-sandwich complexes of Rh, Cp*Rh(III)-H intermediates are critical hydride-delivery agents. For the bipyridine-supported complexes, a unique transformation dubbed ‘Cp* non-innocence’ leads to the observation of (Cp*H)Rh(I)...

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(108 reference statements)
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is noteworthy that alcohols as a necessary evil (i.e., uneconomical B–H protonolysis leading to in situ borane formation) are not required when either a better electrophile or a stronger hydride donor is involved; indeed, the uncatalyzed reduction of CO 2 (a better electrophile) with BH 4 – as reported by Knopf and Cummins and the reduction of cyclohexanone with triethylborohydride (aptly named superhydride owing to its superior hydride donating ability) both occur in aprotic solvents and, as calculated in this work, involve kinetically accessible barriers associated with intermolecular hydride transfers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is noteworthy that alcohols as a necessary evil (i.e., uneconomical B–H protonolysis leading to in situ borane formation) are not required when either a better electrophile or a stronger hydride donor is involved; indeed, the uncatalyzed reduction of CO 2 (a better electrophile) with BH 4 – as reported by Knopf and Cummins and the reduction of cyclohexanone with triethylborohydride (aptly named superhydride owing to its superior hydride donating ability) both occur in aprotic solvents and, as calculated in this work, involve kinetically accessible barriers associated with intermolecular hydride transfers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…17,20,21 Clearly the reactivity of these complexes is strongly influenced by the supporting bidentate chelating ligand, but it is not apparent what ligand features (e.g., donor atom identity, metal-ligand bite angle, or steric bulk) promote or hinder catalysis. Although previous computational studies have investigated the mechanism for H 2 generation, 22,23 this study tries to understand in detail what the role of the ligand is, which may provide key insights for the design of better catalysts. The ligand-based features of these structures have then been systematically varied to ascertain their effect on the reaction energy of each step.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23,26,27 Clearly the reactivity of these complexes is strongly influenced by the supporting bidentate chelating ligand, but it is not apparent what ligand features (e.g., donor atom identity, metal−ligand bite angle, or steric bulk) promote or hinder catalysis. Although previous computational studies have investigated the mechanism for H 2 generation, 28,29 this study tries to understand in detail what the role of the ligand is, which may provide key insights for the design of better catalysts. The ligand-based features of these structures were then systematically varied to ascertain their effect on the reaction energy of each step.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, if the bpy ligand is replaced with bis­(diphenylphosphino) methane ( dppm ), bis­(diphenylphosphino)­benzene ( dppb ), or bis­(diphenylphosphino)-9,9′-dimethylxanthene ( dppx ), the Rh­(III)H species can be generated but is stabilized significantly, implying from experimental work that Reaction 2 is no longer favorable and cannot proceed, even upon exposure of the Rh­(III)H species to strong acid(s). ,, Clearly the reactivity of these complexes is strongly influenced by the supporting bidentate chelating ligand, but it is not apparent what ligand features (e.g., donor atom identity, metal–ligand bite angle, or steric bulk) promote or hinder catalysis. Although previous computational studies have investigated the mechanism for H 2 generation, , this study tries to understand in detail what the role of the ligand is, which may provide key insights for the design of better catalysts. The ligand-based features of these structures were then systematically varied to ascertain their effect on the reaction energy of each step.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%