2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0920-5861(00)00290-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cr-doped Zr, Si-mesoporous molecular sieves as catalysts of CH2Cl2 oxidation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…98.5% conversion of DCE to CO 2 /H 2 O/HCl with 0.5 wt % Pt/CrOOH catalyst was possible at 330 °C and GHSV = 46 000h -1 . All other catalysts reported in the literature ( ) required a much lower GHSV (<30 000 h -1 ) for this conversion at temperature ≤400 °C.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…98.5% conversion of DCE to CO 2 /H 2 O/HCl with 0.5 wt % Pt/CrOOH catalyst was possible at 330 °C and GHSV = 46 000h -1 . All other catalysts reported in the literature ( ) required a much lower GHSV (<30 000 h -1 ) for this conversion at temperature ≤400 °C.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 80%
“…For example, the activity of TiO2-supported catalysts in trichloroethylene (TCE) removal at 400 °C increased as CrOx (98%) > MnOx (79%) > Pt (72%) > CoOx ) CuOx (58%) > FeOx (54%) > Ni (49%) (13). Chromium oxide catalysts supported on Zr/SiO2 (14), Al2O3 (2,15,16), porous carbon (17), pillared clay (18), zeolites (19), SnO2 (20), and TiO2 (11,21) were reported to be effective in removal of carbon tetrachloride, chloromethane, ethyl chloride (EC), 1,2-dichloroethane (DCE), TCE, perchloroethylene (PCE), chlorobenzene (CB), 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene, tetrachloroethylene, and 1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane. Complete destruction of these CVOC was achieved at 400-475 °C and GHSV ) 6000-30 000 h -1 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been reported in previous literature that transition metal (Cr, Mn, Co, Cu, etc.) modified zeolite catalysts exhibit good catalytic activity for the destruction of CVOCs in spite of relatively less active than noble metal modified catalysts [14][15][16]. However, the migration and/or loss of active sites may cause the deactivation in a certain degree.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Development of a new type of catalysts for this reaction does not appear to be an easy task due to the poisoning and the existence of water vapor ( 3, 9, 10 ). Even though a lot of works have been devoted to supported or unsupported metal oxides such as transition metal oxides ( ), ion exchanged zeolites ( ), TiO 2 based catalysts ( ), and perovskite type oxides ( ), little had been reported on the direct comparison of catalytic activity among different catalysts under the same reaction conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%