2024
DOI: 10.1109/access.2023.3347352
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

CR-YOLOv8: Multiscale Object Detection in Traffic Sign Images

Lu Jia Zhang,
Jian Jun Fang,
Yan Xia Liu
et al.

Abstract: Due to the large-scale changes of different forms of traffic signs and the rapid speed of vehicles, the detection accuracy and real-time performance of general object detectors are greatly challenged, especially the detection accuracy of small objects. In order to solve this problem, a multi-scale traffic sign detection model CR-YOLOv8 is proposed based on the latest YOLOv8. In the feature extraction stage, the attention module is introduced to enhance the channel and spatial features, so that the network can … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Compared with the method in this study, YOLOv5(l) has a higher detection accuracy, and according to the comprehensive analysis of Tables 4 and 6, the algorithm in this paper has the advantages of high detection accuracy and speed. In order to prove that the detection performance of this paper's algorithm is better than the existing state-of-the-art traffic sign detection algorithms, the algorithm in this paper is compared with ETSR-YOLO [30], TRD-YOLO [31], and CR-YOLOv8 [32], and the accuracy of traffic sign detection is better than the three traffic sign target detection algorithms mentioned above.…”
Section: Comparative Analysis Of Algorithm In Real-timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Compared with the method in this study, YOLOv5(l) has a higher detection accuracy, and according to the comprehensive analysis of Tables 4 and 6, the algorithm in this paper has the advantages of high detection accuracy and speed. In order to prove that the detection performance of this paper's algorithm is better than the existing state-of-the-art traffic sign detection algorithms, the algorithm in this paper is compared with ETSR-YOLO [30], TRD-YOLO [31], and CR-YOLOv8 [32], and the accuracy of traffic sign detection is better than the three traffic sign target detection algorithms mentioned above.…”
Section: Comparative Analysis Of Algorithm In Real-timementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Faster-RCNN 63.4 28.3 -83 SSD [16] 75.1 26.1 80.9 24 STC-YOLO [26] 88.9 6.70 -87 Improved YOLOv5 [35] 81.9 7.51 16.8 30 SEDG-YOLOv5 [36] 91.0 2.77 6.2 178 YOLOv7-tiny [38] 93.4 23.29 -67 CR-YOLOv8 [43] 86.9 14.60 -103 CTM-YOLOv8n 94.3 0.89 9.7 161…”
Section: Model Map@050 (%) Params (M) Gflops Fpsmentioning
confidence: 99%