2018
DOI: 10.1007/s13349-018-0295-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crack detection in prestressed concrete structures by measuring their natural frequencies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
10
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…e resulting modification of the FEM will indicate the locations and extents of structural damage. Depending on the type of parameters used, the FEM updating methods can be divided into frequency based methods [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13], mode shape based methods [14][15][16][17], flexibility based methods [18][19][20][21][22][23], displacement based methods [24][25][26], and so on. In most cases, these FEM updating methods will come down to the solution of a system of linear equations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…e resulting modification of the FEM will indicate the locations and extents of structural damage. Depending on the type of parameters used, the FEM updating methods can be divided into frequency based methods [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13], mode shape based methods [14][15][16][17], flexibility based methods [18][19][20][21][22][23], displacement based methods [24][25][26], and so on. In most cases, these FEM updating methods will come down to the solution of a system of linear equations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Numerous researches were carried out using long-term monitoring [4]- [6]. In fact, some structures are monitored 24 hours a day, 7 days a week, to supply dynamic measurements that can be used for the identification of structural problems, such as the presence of cracks [7], [8], excessive vibration [9]- [11], damage identification [12]- [15], among others. Furthermore, structural dynamic analyses allow performing a quite extensive structural evaluation concerning its reliability, vulnerability or even its life cycle [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent decades, structural damage evaluation has become a key issue in the field of civil engineering, mechanical engineering, aerospace engineering and so on. The method based on natural frequency changes [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11] is one of the mainstream methods for structural damage evaluation, since the natural frequencies are most easily and accurately measured in comparison with other dynamic characteristics of a structure. Messina et al [3] proposed a damage detection method termed the multiple damage location assurance criterion by using the natural frequency sensitivity analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was shown that selecting vibration modes with low NRR values improves the prediction accuracy of frequency-based damage detection. Ercolani et al [11] studied the inverse method of damage detection from the measurement of the first three natural frequencies of vibration on two experimental beams.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%