2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.ndteint.2013.11.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Crack detection limits in unit based masonry with terrestrial laser scanning

Abstract: This paper presents the fundamental mathematics to determine the minimum crack width detectable with a terrestrial laser scanner in unit-based masonry. Orthogonal offset, interval scan angle, crack orientation, and crack depth are the main parameters. The theoretical work is benchmarked against laboratory tests using 4 samples with predesigned crack widths of 1-7mm scanned at orthogonal distances of 5.0-12.5m and at angles of 0˚-30˚. Results showed that absolute errors of crack width were mostly less than 1.37… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
52
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 103 publications
(61 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
4
52
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…As an example, according to a recent study by Laefer et al [11], TLS can detect a crack as little as twice its sampling step (confirming the values of 1.6mm to 4.8mm proposed by Ahlborn et al [1]). Based on this, a TLS-based crack detection workflow is proposed in (Figure 4).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…As an example, according to a recent study by Laefer et al [11], TLS can detect a crack as little as twice its sampling step (confirming the values of 1.6mm to 4.8mm proposed by Ahlborn et al [1]). Based on this, a TLS-based crack detection workflow is proposed in (Figure 4).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 76%
“…Several image processing studies have been done in order to detect defects automatically [4,5,6,7,8]. However, the images are affected by the light conditions and their analysis requires supplementary information [9]. On the other hand, LiDAR is used for collecting point clouds.…”
Section: Methods For Surface Defects Inspectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…5b). Next, an outlier remove procedure (step 2.1) was proposed to iteratively eliminate outlier points -those having a distance from the point to the fitting surface of the connection plate that is larger than the perpendicular noise level of the range measurement [13,14]. The process was considered complete when no outlier point remained or the deviation between the normal vectors of two consecutive fitting planes was less than 1 degree.…”
Section: Connectionmentioning
confidence: 99%